Compare Amazon SES vs. SocketLabs
Ranking  | |
Views 1,707 Comparisons 1,584 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 707 Comparisons 639 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 30% of the time.  Compared 21% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. | Compared 57% of the time. Compared 17% of the time. Compared 7% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| AWS Messaging, SES | |
Learn | |
| Amazon | SocketLabs |
Overview | |
| Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) is a cost-effective outbound-only email-sending service built on the reliable and scalable infrastructure that Amazon.com has developed to serve its own customer base. With Amazon SES, you can send transactional email, marketing messages, or any other type of high-quality content and you only pay for what you use. | Easy, reliable email delivery service for marketing and transactional applications. Socketlabs has email performance down to a science. Fast and easy setup. Try SocketLabs for free - no credit card required. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Amazon SES | Learn more about SocketLabs |
Sample Customers | |
| Yelp, Spotify, Pinterest, Airbnb, Instacart, Flipboard, Slack, Rovio | Cafe Press, Maxon, Intuit, Panera Bread, American Red Cross, ADP, Ball State University, Ohio University, Dell SecureWorks |
Amazon SES is ranked 4th in Cloud Email while SocketLabs is ranked 7th in Cloud Email. Amazon SES is rated 0.0, while SocketLabs is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Amazon SES is most compared with MailChimp, SendinBlue, SendGrid, Mailgun and Constant Contact, whereas SocketLabs is most compared with SendGrid, Mailgun, MailChimp and SendinBlue.
See our list of best Cloud Email vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Email reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.