Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
It is very easy to use, and there is less room for error.
Ansible Tower offers use a UI where we can see all the pushes that have gone into the server.
Its checking and validating ensures our packages are properly patched.
The biggest thing I liked about Ansible is the check mode so that we can verify, after we've pushed, that the config there is actually what we intended.
I like being able to control multiple systems and push out updates quickly with just a couple of clicks of a button and commands. I like the automation because it is a time saver.
It was easy to read and learn. It is a YAML-based syntax, which makes it easily understand and pick up.
It increases our company's efficiency, automating all the simple tasks which used to take hours of somebody's time.
It is agentless. I don't have to think about which client system my unit has understanding in or not, because I can execute from my system. It will go and configure it, and any module that it is looking for will be shipped out.
The Automation API has opened up a world of possibilities for us, including the ability to create workflows on-demand using traditional DevOps tools.
I find it very helpful to be able to keep track of all our help desk tickets.
Most of our tasks also deal with databases, and Control-M's purpose-built module for the databases comes in very handy when handling database components.
BIM is a good tool to monitor SLAs, and being a financial organization, this is a very good feature for us.
The most valuable features are the managing of file transfers and the product keeping up with technology.
The monitoring tool is very good. It's very easy for expert and entry-level users to use on short notice.
It can do anything that I need. We do real-time jobs. We also do jobs that have to run at certain times. I have not been presented with a scheduling need that I was not able to do. It is very flexible and dynamic.
Monitoring is a valuable aspect of it. The monitoring tool is very good, and it is easy for expert and entry level users to use on a short notice.
For Ansible Tower, there are three tiers with ten nodes. I would like them to expand those ten nodes to 20, because ten nodes is not enough to test on.
Ansible could use more public relations and marketing.
I have seen indications that the documentation needs improvement. They are providing a "How to Improve Your Documentation" presentation at this conference.
The user interface on the Ansible Tower product could be better, but it is functional.
Documentation could be improved. Many times, if I'm looking for something, I have to Google it in a lot of places, then figure out what the best approach will be. There are some best practices documents, but they don't give you the information.
One problem that I'm facing right now is the mismatch between the new version of Python and Ansible. Sometimes it's Python 2, and sometimes it's Python 3. When things get a bit dicey, I wish that Ansible would solve this issue by itself. I don't want to have to specify if it is Python 3 or version 2.
Some of the Cisco modules could be expanded, which would be great, along with not having to do so much coding in the background to make it work.
It is a little slow on the network side because every time you call a module, it's initiating an SSH or an API call to a network device, and it just slows things down.
The next major release needs to focus on the lightweight web client.
There's a lot of room for improvement and I think it can be more user-friendly.
A developer sandbox could be very helpful to try out new features or experience them.
The Control-M API does not support SQL database-type jobs, where a job has been configured to use the SQL catalog to locate SSIS.
Their technicians should be more involved when we're applying new technology to Control-M, such as cloud. We're working with cloud right now, with AWS, and getting the attention of a technician, sometimes, can take some time. It would be nice if they had somebody assigned to it. Dedicated support.
I would like not to have to reach out to a third-party application company to do automated notifications. Right now, we still have people manually calling people and emailing people. There's a company called xMatters - and there are others - that has an API through Control-M that can automate any aspect of failure management. I'd like to see it build right into the product. I'd like to see a better notification product.
I'm not sure how the solution fits together with our business modernization initiatives, as there are things outside of my area, even though Control-M is the scheduling tool of the company. They may use other things, e.g., Big Data.
The reporting tool still needs a lot of improvement. It was supposed to get better with the upgrade, and it really didn't get better. It needs help, because it's such a useful thing to have. It needs to be more powerful and easier to use.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Ansible Tower is free. Until they lower the cost, we are holding off on purchasing the product.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for.
Licensing costs are around $3000 a year.
It works on task-based licensing.
This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations.
We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing.
As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost.
We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost.
we are more looking for a better cost/license/performance model because BMC, while we could say it's the best, is also the most expensive. That is what we are probably most annoyed with. We are paying something like €1,000,000 over three years for having 4,000 jobs running. That's expensive.
out of 29 in Configuration Management
Average Words per Review
out of 22 in Workload Automation
Average Words per Review
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
|Ansible is the simplest way to deploy your applications. It gives you the power to deploy multi-tier applications reliably and consistently, all from one common framework. You can configure needed services as well as push application artifacts from one common system.|
Control‑M is a digital enterprise management solution that simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
Automate job scheduling and application deployment
Learn more about Ansible
Learn more about Control-M
|HootSuite Media, Inc., Cloud Physics, Narrative, BinckBank||CARFAX, ChipRewards, Sun Chemical, University of California, Unum|
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider17%
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm42%
Comms Service Provider6%
Software R&D Company44%
Comms Service Provider9%
Marketing Services Firm6%