Apache Web Server vs WebLogic Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,673 views|3,087 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,342 views|1,114 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Apache Web Server and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The open-source nature is one of its most significant advantages.""The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.""The most significant advantage is the ability to swiftly enable HTTPS services when my DNS is configured correctly.""The solution's most valuable feature is reporting.""Its community is its most valuable feature. Solving problems is easier on Apache because so many people know this product.""Most of the features I liked were related to the performance during peak hours.""It is scalable.""The control panel is very easy to navigate. It's similar to most hosting platforms, so it's user-friendly. Once you get used to it, managing your hosting becomes easy, too."

More Apache Web Server Pros →

"The most valuable feature of WebLogic is it has excellent performance and stability compared to the previous solution we used.""What I've been seeing as the most valuable characteristics of WebLogic Suite include robustness and scalability. It's a really good solution, and I'm not saying this because my company is a partner of WebLogic Suite. I also like that with the newer versions of the solution, you can deploy WebLogic Suite faster. Oracle also provides excellent technical support.""The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent.""The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment.""The solution is very scalable. It's easy to add processes even if you are new to the solution.""The product is reliable.""It integrates well with other solutions.""It easily connects to other Oracle products and services."

More WebLogic Suite Pros →

Cons
"Adding a reverse proxy to Apache Web Server would be a significant improvement.""The product's initial setup process could be easier for users.""Its stability could be better.""So far, for us, everything is okay.""There is a security-related problem that depends on the web server's configuration.""A monitoring interface would be great for this product. The monitoring dashboards for Apache's models are not included in the basic installation. You can install the basic monitoring model, then connect this model to another monitoring system.""I want the user interface to be more user-friendly.""The interface has room for improvement."

More Apache Web Server Cons →

"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better.""There are sometimes issues with clusters.""Lacking a solution for smaller applications.""The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition.""This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters.""I think the support could be much better.""I rate the scalability of WebLogic Suite an eight out of ten.""I would like to see the licensing policy simplified."

More WebLogic Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The apache software is free, open-source."
  • "It is a free-of-cost solution."
  • "There is no licensing cost for the product."
  • "It is an open-source solution."
  • More Apache Web Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Scaling is costly."
  • "Technical support is very costly."
  • "There is a license required for this solution and the price could be reduced."
  • "The cost of the WebLogic Suite license is a bit high."
  • "The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support."
  • More WebLogic Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.
    Top Answer:The price of the product is an area handled by the procurement team in my company.
    Top Answer:When it comes to Apache Web Server, I don't have any suggestions for improvement because we use it in the UAT environment. For production, my company mainly uses NGINX. There is no direct package… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is useful for centralizing data.
    Top Answer:We pay for Oracle Premier Support. The product comes bundled with Oracle Premier Support.
    Top Answer:The documentation is too broad. The content search is not easy. We see a lot of sources of information, but we must dig in to get what we need. We need to do trial and error. It might be because there… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,673
    Comparisons
    3,087
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    1,342
    Comparisons
    1,114
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    538
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Apache HTTP Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

    This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

    Oracle WebLogic Suite is an integrated solution for building onpremise cloud application infrastructures that span web server, application server and data grid technology tiers. It includes Oracle WebLogic Server, an application server for developing and deploying applications across conventional and cloud environments, Oracle Coherence Enterprise Edition, Oracle Web Tier, Oracle TopLink, Oracle Java Mission Control and Flight Recorder, and other component technologies.

    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx
    State Revenue Office Victoria, Colab Consulting Pty. Ltd., Reliance Commercial Finance, Center for Railway Information Systems, Sascar, Banca Transilvania, UL, Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, MCB Bank, Pacfico Seguros Generales
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    University7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Government11%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Training & Coaching Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Apache Web Server is ranked 3rd in Application Infrastructure with 21 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Apache Web Server is rated 8.6, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache Web Server writes "Has good security, speed and traffic handling features ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Apache Web Server is most compared with IIS, NGINX Plus, IBM WebSphere Application Server, Microsoft .NET Framework and Azul Zulu, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Microsoft .NET Framework, Oracle WebCenter and NGINX Plus. See our Apache Web Server vs. WebLogic Suite report.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.