We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile APM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a wonderful monitoring tool that manages various aspects such as system resources (CPU, RAM), mobile performance, and infrastructure monitoring."
"Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."
"This solution is easy to use and very powerful, it is a complete tool for us."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to take a report, and in particular, a visual, and link it to actual application performance and then the consequences. This means you can show how an incident or action has an effect on the business."
"The release management capabilities are great."
"The solution helps us provide a better user experience to our customers."
"It is a good monitoring tool. Its stability is very good."
"It gives me the ability to trace logs between transactions, for example, a DB transaction or JVM transaction from one hub to the other. I can easily find out where the problem is or where the bottleneck of the issues lies."
"For anybody who is looking into enhancing or improving their application code quality, I would definitely recommend this solution."
"There are many features that are very valuable to us, but the ability to monitor the status of the users' experience in real-time is one of them."
"In the case of a mobile banking application, AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring successfully reduced the response time from eight seconds to just one second. In another example, the tool identified an issue within the mobile app, causing lost transactions in the billing system."
"We have found the scalability to be quite good."
"Whenever the application crashes from user behavior, we can easily simulate the error. We are happy with this feature and find it to be valuable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI."
"It could do with more than one data centre/multiple AWS accounts in a pane of glass. Also, improved scalability to large environments would be helpful."
"There needs to be an option to capture all the sessions for all the users, not just samplings."
"Sometimes, it is hard to navigate through and find if something is wrong or figure out where an error stemmed from."
"I think I would like to see a better way to deploy and upgrade the machine agents that we use. Currently, we have to use SCCM, and that might just be our environment with the customer."
"It is stable, but the only downside is the licensing part."
"An area that has room for improvement on the CR and ERP would be the addition of monitoring of the internal solution. For example, you can monitor the day-to-day and everything in the transactions with AppDynamics, but there's also a lot going on in the kernel itself that you cannot monitor. The automation needs to improve as well. As it stands, a lot of customization needs to happen before you can use AppDynamics."
"Rolling out version upgrades is a difficult job at times."
"There could log management features included in the product."
"There may be some older technologies that are still covered, however, it's not as plug-and-play. You can still do it, however, it takes slightly more effort for engineers to cover old technologies such as C++, Delphi, and so on. It still can be done. It's just not as easy as, for example, covering Java."
"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."
"The only improvement I see is intercepting calls in a mobile application without injecting additional code. Currently, when instrumenting or monitoring a mobile application, it's necessary to release updates, prompt users to upgrade, and inject code into the backend. It would be beneficial if there were a method to intercept these calls without requiring users to download and upgrade the application. However, I'm unsure about the feasibility of such an approach."
"I would like to see a better way to automate actions based on the events generated by the tool."
"The way the agentless monitoring and agent monitoring get used is to be decided by the user, but there is no clarification on the setup phase or on how and why to use the aforementioned options."
"In terms of improvements we would like to see, we want to understand what the battery consumption metrics are whenever a user is viewing. It would be really helpful for us if we could get those details levels."
More AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
AppDynamics is ranked 3rd in Mobile APM with 153 reviews while AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is ranked 5th in Mobile APM with 6 reviews. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring writes "Offers insights into peak usage hours, the application's status, and that of secondary services, such as databases and APIs". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring is most compared with . See our AppDynamics vs. AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring report.
See our list of best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Mobile APM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
