We performed a comparison between AppDynamics and Cavisson NetDiagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Once you get past installation, AppDynamics is highly stable and we get good results."
"Despite dozens of deployments across hundreds of applications- we have yet to see a case where AD is negatively impacting application execution or functionality."
"The real user monitoring helps us evaluate our customers' real experiences, which is valuable as an eCommerce company."
"The most valuable feature of AppDynamics is its ability to track the transactions between different applications."
"That visual representation’s been really good, also the overhead that AppDynamics creates is quite small. We've tried Dynatrace in the past. Some of the applications didn't work as well with Dynatrace."
"AppDynamics has been stable."
"We previously had an operations team continuously monitoring applications. Now, they just have set things up and our developers can monitor, view, and act on them, accordingly."
"In AppDynamics, everywhere I go, there's some sort of grouping and aggregation function, or there's some sort of timeline that lets me zero in more quickly on the traces that I need. They go to more pains to aggregate and bubble the important ones to the top. That removes a lot of manual work."
"Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"The dashboard can be better. Also, the automated reports could be improved."
"One area for improvement is the MST model. It would be more helpful if it could be offered as a managed service provider model with more multi-tenancy and features."
"AppDynamics could benefit from greater integration with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning."
"They need to improve the consolidation of agents for the agent's installation process."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"As per my experience, the drill-down feature can be improved at the class level."
"I would like to see more of a unified platform. They're very, very new on the server side, machine agents. I want them to be more mature in this area."
"If it can be able to intelligently provide all the things we need to look at, from a data point of view, that would be very useful."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
Earn 20 points
AppDynamics is ranked 5th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 153 reviews while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. AppDynamics is rated 8.2, while Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of AppDynamics writes "Very good real-time monitoring capabilities, deep problem diagnosis, and transaction mapping". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". AppDynamics is most compared with Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Datadog, Splunk Enterprise Security and New Relic, whereas Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with .
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.