We performed a comparison between Arcserve Cloud Services and Azure Site Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service."The backup retention was pretty good. Being able to archive users who had been backed up, is a good functionality. Even if they've been deactivated it'll keep the backups and keep them protected."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"Site Recovery's most valuable features include its user-friendly console and the ease of migration."
"Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery."
"Azure Site Recovery helps to save costs."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around one to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"The primary area for improvement in Azure Site Recovery is its pricing."
"I would like to see more security features."
"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
Earn 20 points
Arcserve Cloud Services is ranked 17th in Disaster Recovery as a Service while Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews. Arcserve Cloud Services is rated 5.0, while Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Arcserve Cloud Services writes "Good backup retention but it is not a reliable platform and it doesn't giving any sort of alerts that things are not working". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". Arcserve Cloud Services is most compared with Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365 and Veeam Backup & Replication, whereas Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.