We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Azure Site Recovery Pros and Cons

Azure Site Recovery Pros

VP
Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.
View full review »
HV
Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The solution is very easy to use.
View full review »
MC
Manager, Information Technology Service Operations at Lynnco
The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, VMware and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: October 2021.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AF
Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is a very stable product and very scalable.
View full review »

Azure Site Recovery Cons

VP
Sr. Sales Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It could include more of a backup and recovery.
View full review »
HV
Technical Director at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.
View full review »
MC
Manager, Information Technology Service Operations at Lynnco
It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, VMware and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: October 2021.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AF
Portfolio Manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, VMware and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: October 2021.
541,462 professionals have used our research since 2012.