We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and FileAudit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an efficient solution."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"The ESM use cases are the most valuable. It enables us to use the big data collection inside our company. We are able to create use cases for whatever it suits and I find that the most interesting part of any SIEM solution."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"It is one of the best products available in the market."
"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."
"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."
"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"It is really difficult to work in ArcSight Logger, as it is very slow."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."
"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."
"The updates management and central management console could be improved."
"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."
ArcSight Logger is ranked 29th in Log Management with 30 reviews while FileAudit is ranked 42nd in Log Management with 3 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while FileAudit is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileAudit writes "A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas FileAudit is most compared with ManageEngine File Audit Plus. See our ArcSight Logger vs. FileAudit report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
