We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN.Earn 20 points
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 46 reviews while Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Wireless WAN. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] writes "Great for hospitals as the main hospital is usually the hub of many smaller buildings and also the tallest building in the neighborhood". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless, Fortinet FortiWLM and Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, whereas Motorola Wireless WAN [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.