We performed a comparison between AT&T VPN and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The stability of the solution is its most valuable feature."
"The management of the solution is very simple. It allows for a single view of all the endpoints."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"One of the most outstanding features is the ability to deliver third-party services and achieve double authenticity with integrated identities."
"We have more control over the activity that users have on the internal network, thanks to the monitoring offered by Check Point and the security provided by the gateway."
"The ability to create your trigger data domains is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The policies are easy to use."
"Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The solution had slow connections and very bad routers. We continuously had issues with the VPN and proxy configuration."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"It would be good to have Remote Access VPN solutions for Check Point edge services."
"In the case of URL translation of the VPN Web portal, the requests made from the front end to the back end weren't valid (due to the use of dynamic subdomains). In the case of host translations, the request was made to the same host, however, we cannot specify the ports, which, in our case, are used to redirect to different servers."
"The VPN remote Access blade could be improved."
"The fully-featured security module is only supported on Windows and Mac systems, which means that organizations with Linux will face issues providing secure access."
"The Compliance software blade is available only for the Windows operating systems family, so no macOS security checks are implemented and performed."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
AT&T VPN is ranked 40th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews. AT&T VPN is rated 9.0, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of AT&T VPN writes "Extremely stable and very scalable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". AT&T VPN is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.