We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"For a basic setup, implementation is quite easy."
"The tool is easy to configure and use. We integrated it with Active Directory to manage user authentication. It's intuitive and transparent, making it simple for users to use. It connects automatically to the VPN whenever users turn on the laptop. The product is efficient and offers centralized control."
"Technical support has been excellent."
"The biggest advantage of Check Point Remote Access VPN is that we already use the Check Point firewall. We only needed to enable the feature and do the configuration in order to enable the VPN feature. We didn't need to buy or manage new hardware. This was a big advantage."
"Setting policies allow, block, and limit users' access."
"Thanks to all these security processes, our users can access our infrastructure with the certainty that we will not be compromised."
"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."
"Setup using the manuals was easy."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is reliable and easy to configure, and the Cisco Firewall can last for many years."
"The installation process is not difficult."
"The solution is a super product that works as designed."
"You can use it from anywhere."
"Support does solve our issues."
"Technical support is always helpful."
"This solution is stable. There have been no technical issues."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The VPN remote Access blade could be improved."
"Connection of devices from various locations is efficient though there are a few challenges when there is a network failure."
"This is the best version we are using, however, if some changes can be made in the next release, I'd like to see adjustments to the time period and internet connectivity."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster."
"I cannot see the full effect of the endpoint solution because it relies on having access to the DNF queries, which might not go through the Check Point firewall when you're using it for perimeter networks. Check Point will not identify the actual source of the net queries. This may be related to the architecture, however, and not poor product issues. I don't know if it can be improved on the Check Point side or not."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"There was complexity in the initial setup."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"If there's any cloud version available, instead of on-premise, that would be ideal."
"If they could simplify connections via other machines, like Linux or Mac OS X, it would be helpful."
"One improvement could be ensuring better backward compatibility."
"We'd like the product to be cheaper."
"Sometimes when you disconnect or switch from one wireless network to another, it's necessary to re-login."
"The setup could be simplified for solutions engineers with a wizard."
"There is nothing they need to improve at this moment."
"The notifications need to be improved. If the VPN is disconnected for a long period of time, they should push out notifications. We need to manually check if the VPN is connected or not. Sometimes it automatically disconnects, but the user doesn't get notifications, and we need to troubleshoot or open the client to manually reconnect. Auto-reconnection would be an improvement."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews while Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 69 reviews. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client writes "A stable solution that helps users connect to resources when working from home". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange and Symantec VIP Access Manager, whereas Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Fortinet FortiClient and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Check Point Remote Access VPN vs. Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
