Compare Atlassian ALM vs. PTC Integrity

Atlassian ALM is ranked 11th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 14th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews. Atlassian ALM is rated 8.6, while PTC Integrity is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian ALM writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and has good integration with other Atlassian products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". Atlassian ALM is most compared with PTC Integrity, TFS and IBM Engineering Workflow Management, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with JIRA, Polarion ALM and TFS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian ALM Logo
1,328 views|1,047 comparisons
PTC Integrity Logo
1,944 views|1,451 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use PTC Integrity? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The main power of this tool is the integration between the different products of the Atlassian suite. We have good integration with work management with Java. This is the major strength from this provider.This solution fits very well into our agile product management environment.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.Complete traceability as per process requirements.We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.

Read more »

Cons
The automation for scheduling software and doing software tests should be simplified because it's complex and too rigid.The reports are not really customizable, which is something that they should improve on.

Read more »

We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There is a community edition available, but if the price were lower for the addons then more people would use the full version.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
1,328
Comparisons
1,047
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
518
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
1,944
Comparisons
1,451
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
464
Avg. Rating
6.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
MKS
Learn
Atlassian
PTC
Overview

How to use Atlassian to manage application lifecycle

Atlassian builds software to pull together all the elements of application lifecycle management. Product management, developers, Q/A, dev ops, and business stake holders all have their own ways of interacting with application lifecycle management and Atlassian splits up the process into a few buckets.

1) Collaborate to plan and envision work

Atlassian's Confluence is a collaboration platform for building and driving consensus. Call stake holders in to give approval, comment on, and share pages and integrate with the rest of the development toolchain.

2) Build and track roadmaps

Atlassian's JIRA Software offers incredibly flexible project management with custom workflows, plugins, and high visibility rollups through JIRA Portfolio. Issues can be embedded right in confluence, or be used to kick off new branches in version control. Keep everyone on the same page with project progress. 

3) Track and deploy code

Atlassian's Bitbucket is the world's most robust Git solution. The ability to deploy multiple-nodes with failover, global mirroring for super fast clones, and powerful code review control set it apart from competition. Bitbucket also has a mature plugin and hooks system that allows extensions and connection to a suite of CI software. 

4) Support and Iterate

Track support requests, bugs, and route users in the right direction with JIRA Service Desk. With the same custom workflow engine as JIRA Software, a tight integration with the rest of the stack, and a knowledge base function make it a powerful addition to the ALM stack. 

5) Tie it together

ChatOps helps tie every part of the ALM together. Get stake holders in the same room to manage a project, teams in the same page to manage their work, or plugin automated members to report on CI status, pull requests, page changes in Confluence, or bug reports. Like every piece of Atlassian's ALM there is a mature API for extending plugins and everything can be hosted behind your own firewall. 



The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about Atlassian ALM
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, IllumniaTRW Automotive
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company50%
Manufacturing Company25%
Aerospace/Defense Firm13%
Engineering Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Transportation Company17%
Manufacturing Company17%
Comms Service Provider9%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.