Compare Atlassian ALM vs. PTC Integrity

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Planview LeanKit Logo
565 views|278 comparisons
Atlassian ALM Logo
868 views|702 comparisons
PTC Integrity Logo
2,254 views|1,567 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian ALM vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It makes work visible, so everybody knows where everything is. It uses Kanban, and that makes work visible.""We use the board and card hierarchies in terms of sprints so that we can see if we have cross-functional teams that are working on the same projects together, especially when projects have dependencies. The parent-child relationship within cards is really nice so that we can see what kind of dependencies there are when we're trying to get projects finished.""My team specifically uses our board for all of our Remedy tickets that come in. We had a card for every ticket that we get, and we're able to add the link to that specific ticket there.If I'm out of office, for example, and someone else needs to work a ticket or someone is being contacted to work on a ticket, I don't have to sign on it. Someone else can easily access that ticket because I put the link in there. It's nice. It has a lot of great functionality in there.""Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner. It is highly collaborative; everybody can see things in one place. It is a highly functional, but pretty simple tool. That is hard to find: A tool that has a lot of functions, but is also simple."

More Planview LeanKit Pros »

"This solution fits very well into our agile product management environment.""The main power of this tool is the integration between the different products of the Atlassian suite. We have good integration with work management with Java. This is the major strength from this provider."

More Atlassian ALM Pros »

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information.""We found the requirement management and the version control features to be the most useful for our client.""Complete traceability as per process requirements.""The tool is quite structured and has a good command set.""The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project.""It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

More PTC Integrity Pros »

Cons
"I do not know what it can do in the area of scrum. Maybe it has that functionality. I have never tried to set it up. You think of LeanKit from the perspective of Kanban. I don't know if there is a template for scrum, a scaled agile framework, or any of those scaling frameworks.""Being able to track actual time on cards or sprints, instead of using just the planned start and stop date, would also be useful. I would like to see something like JIRA has with actual sprint starts and stops.""The ability to report on customizable fields and third-party extensions needs improvement. I'd like to see more of those being able to be used. I don't know how that works for Planview, but just getting a little bit more added there would be nice.""The integration with the Enterprise One product is probably an area for improvement. It's not really broken. It's just that it is such a handy tool and a great way to visually manage things. There is a very limited hookup/integration between Enterprise One, which is the master Planview tool, and LeanKit. While they are looking at this on their roadmap, it definitely needs to happen. There is a lot of opportunity there."

More Planview LeanKit Cons »

"The reports are not really customizable, which is something that they should improve on.""The automation for scheduling software and doing software tests should be simplified because it's complex and too rigid."

More Atlassian ALM Cons »

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue.""It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer.""There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA.""I would like to see better integration from the architectural side.""We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all.""It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

More PTC Integrity Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"In general, Planview's cost structure is reasonable. You get quite a lot of functionality for the license cost that you get."

More Planview LeanKit Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is a community edition available, but if the price were lower for the addons then more people would use the full version."

More Atlassian ALM Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Using the tool seems to save time versus trying to do things in a regular manner. It is highly collaborative; everybody… more »
Top Answer: The integration with the Enterprise One product is probably an area for improvement. It's not really broken. It's just… more »
Top Answer: We have a unique use case. Normally, people use LeanKit to track agile development in IT. However, we use the product to… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks.
Top Answer: It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface… more »
Top Answer: Our primary use case is to develop tasks and controls.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
LeanKit
MKS
Learn More
Overview

Planview LeanKit enables engineering teams across all levels of the organization with a visual work delivery tool to apply Lean management principles to their work, helping them work smarter and deliver faster.

How to use Atlassian to manage application lifecycle

Atlassian builds software to pull together all the elements of application lifecycle management. Product management, developers, Q/A, dev ops, and business stake holders all have their own ways of interacting with application lifecycle management and Atlassian splits up the process into a few buckets.

1) Collaborate to plan and envision work

Atlassian's Confluence is a collaboration platform for building and driving consensus. Call stake holders in to give approval, comment on, and share pages and integrate with the rest of the development toolchain.

2) Build and track roadmaps

Atlassian's JIRA Software offers incredibly flexible project management with custom workflows, plugins, and high visibility rollups through JIRA Portfolio. Issues can be embedded right in confluence, or be used to kick off new branches in version control. Keep everyone on the same page with project progress. 

3) Track and deploy code

Atlassian's Bitbucket is the world's most robust Git solution. The ability to deploy multiple-nodes with failover, global mirroring for super fast clones, and powerful code review control set it apart from competition. Bitbucket also has a mature plugin and hooks system that allows extensions and connection to a suite of CI software. 

4) Support and Iterate

Track support requests, bugs, and route users in the right direction with JIRA Service Desk. With the same custom workflow engine as JIRA Software, a tight integration with the rest of the stack, and a knowledge base function make it a powerful addition to the ALM stack. 

5) Tie it together

ChatOps helps tie every part of the ALM together. Get stake holders in the same room to manage a project, teams in the same page to manage their work, or plugin automated members to report on CI status, pull requests, page changes in Confluence, or bug reports. Like every piece of Atlassian's ALM there is a mature API for extending plugins and everything can be hosted behind your own firewall. 



The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.
Offer
Learn more about Planview LeanKit
Learn more about Atlassian ALM
Learn more about PTC Integrity
Sample Customers
REA Group, Thompson Reuters
Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia
TRW Automotive
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider15%
Manufacturing Company11%
Government8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider18%
Manufacturing Company16%
Government16%
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company50%
Aerospace/Defense Firm20%
Manufacturing Company20%
Engineering Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider14%
Manufacturing Company12%
Transportation Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise67%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian ALM vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Atlassian ALM is ranked 16th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 2 reviews while PTC Integrity is ranked 12th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews. Atlassian ALM is rated 8.6, while PTC Integrity is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian ALM writes "User-friendly, easy to set up, and has good integration with other Atlassian products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity writes "Good item management and version control but does not have good performance ". Atlassian ALM is most compared with Polarion ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational ALM, TFS and Micro Focus ALM Octane, whereas PTC Integrity is most compared with Jira, Polarion ALM, codeBeamer ALM, IBM Rational ALM and TFS. See our Atlassian ALM vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.