We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and SAP NetWeaver based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle, SAP, Aurea and others in SOA Governance."The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"What's most valuable in SAP NetWeaver is the integration. That's been very helpful because the company has one thousand five hundred interfaces running, so integration has been the most significant factor. I've also seen many improvements in the SAP NetWeaver user experience, where users can have reports delivered to mobile devices."
"The presentation is the most valuable feature. It's very conceptual. We had to follow the instructions very strictly. It's a Dutch or German product and we had to follow it step-by-step."
"We can use different transaction codes to check the performance of the system, and if we are unable to access a particular transaction, we can still check the table to see what is happening."
"It is the central point for all our data storage. We have one single version of the truth that we can communicate to all our customers."
"The most valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver is the integration and it is a complete solution."
"I like that I don't need any extra tools to keep the solution up and running."
"With SAP, you can trust what it tells you."
"The integration feature is valuable."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The product documentation can be improved."
"Though SAP NetWeaver has been pretty stable and mature, some issues arose after some customizations, so that's an area for improvement."
"The initial setup was not very easy."
"SAP NetWeaver should be better integrated with other products outside of SAP."
"SAP is likely transitioning to S4, so it is unlikely that they will continue to use NetWeaver."
"The initial setup is a little complex. The users are not able to install the prerequisite drivers or are not able to follow the SOP because they don't have access to SAP Logon. If users already have access, it will take seven to 10 days to deploy the solution. If they do not, it may take a maximum of 25 to 30 days."
"Technical support response time was slow."
"SAP NetWeaver PI is not connected to the cloud."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 3rd in SOA Governance with 7 reviews while SAP NetWeaver is ranked 2nd in SOA Governance with 16 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while SAP NetWeaver is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver writes "A highly scalable solution capable of being used in enterprise-sized businesses". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with Mule ESB, TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas SAP NetWeaver is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite.
See our list of best SOA Governance vendors.
We monitor all SOA Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
