Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net vs Basecamp comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Automation Centre Logo
112 views|103 comparisons
Basecamp Logo
436 views|315 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net and Basecamp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Project Management Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net?
Ken Shaurette
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The licensing costs are approximately $900 annually. I rate the price a four out of ten, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.
Top Answer:The recent update on the solution has made it a little bit complex. For example, to create a team and a project, there is a separate button that you need to click. Recently they updated it with only… more »
Ranking
52nd
Views
112
Comparisons
103
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
Views
436
Comparisons
315
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
349
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
TrackerSuite.Net
Learn More
Overview

TrackerSuite.Net is a suite of integrated, modular work management software applications for Web based Project Management, Help Desk, Timesheets, Purchasing, Resource Management, Business Intelligence and much more. TrackerSuite.Net is well suited for organizations seeking high-speed, Web based solutions over WANs, or as a powerful component of an enterprise Intranet strategy.

Basecamp is a web-based project-management tool developed by Basecamp and launched in 2004, with a new version being launched in 2012. Basecamp offers to-do lists, wiki-style web-based text documents, milestone management, file sharing, time tracking, and a messaging system. Basecamp Classic also offers integration with Basecamp's own Campfire product, and features APIs that are used by a host of web and mobile apps. Basecamp Classic's interface is available in different languages (e.g. Spanish, French, Italian, German, Finnish and Japanese). The newer version of Basecamp currently only supports English as the interface language.
Sample Customers
The Wood Group, Formica, The Dwyer Group, Goodyear, Morton Salt, Konami Party LTD., South Dakota Board of Regents, Bank Audi, Bell Equipment, BMI Federal Credit Union, Minnesota Department of Public Safety, Omron Health Care Europe, Enwin Utilities, DuPont, Capitol Federal Savings
Ashland Addison Florist Co., Victory Auto Wreckers, Ideal Box Co., Hollymatic Corp.
Buyer's Guide
Project Management Software
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net is ranked 52nd in Project Management Software while Basecamp is ranked 22nd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews. Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net is rated 0.0, while Basecamp is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Basecamp writes "Easy to navigate and good for communications but needs better documentation". Automation Centre TrackerSuite.Net is most compared with , whereas Basecamp is most compared with Planview Portfolios, Smartsheet, Jira and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.