We performed a comparison between Basecamp and ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use is valuable."
"The ability to network informally is great for communicating with colleagues."
"The stability is excellent. ServiceNow is one of the leading platforms when it comes to stability."
"As a product, the primary reason we like it is it gets integrated with our ITSM solution so that we don't have to go for an external product for project management like Jira."
"Competitive in terms of research"
"The most valuable feature of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is incident management."
"The ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very intuitive to set up."
"The interface is extremely user-friendly."
"ServiceNow brings to the market different layers with different pricing, so you can customize. And all the layers are really enterprise-ready."
"The interface is user-friendly. It's one of the most user-friendly on the market, and the most complete."
"The product isn't easy to use. It's not very intuitive."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"The interface isn't user-friendly."
"Dashboard interface is limited functionally and not very user friendly"
"The user interface could be more modern."
"The portfolio managed is good for IT, but it's not good for non it's not necessarily great for construction projects, such as the building of physical infrastructure."
"We track salaries or paychecks of the resources. They change from time to time, such as every six months or every year. If they can come up with a default or out-of-the-box feature to manage those multiple payable costs so that we can automatically calculate the project costs rolled up. That would be the coolest feature that we can expect from ServiceNow. We would like to have an automatic feature to manage the payable costs. We should be able to manage or maintain multiple pay costs so that while calculating the project roll-up costs for individual projects, the respective pay costs in a particular period are picked up automatically from the backend. Currently, we have to customize that. It is doable. We have done it but through customization."
"The price is too high."
"The product does not give us the freedom to capture all the instances, test cases, and evidence."
"ServiceNow needs to invest more in integration. That's the only thing. It could always extend its portfolio a little bit."
More ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Basecamp is ranked 22nd in Project Management Software with 3 reviews while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is ranked 3rd in Project Portfolio Management with 27 reviews. Basecamp is rated 7.6, while ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Basecamp writes "Easy to navigate and good for communications but needs better documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management writes "A very strategic demand management tool that visualizes risks and ratings in a bubble chart". Basecamp is most compared with Planview Portfolios, Smartsheet and Jira, whereas ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server and Smartsheet. See our Basecamp vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.