Automic Automation Intelligence vs Automic Workload Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Automation Intelligence and Automic Workload Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Workload Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful.""The Action Packs are a good feature.""The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

More Automic Automation Intelligence Pros →

"Support is good and it works fine.""There are a lot of features which help us get a stable application. It is easy to have a stable production line, because this app supports us very well.""We do not have to use a broad variety of agents to connect to different types of systems.""The night processing helps to have data just-in-time for the morning.""The most important and critical process business in the bank, including COB, closed or business, which has to run on a daily basis, is automated.""The scalability is very good. We can scale it however we want.""It is technology agnostic. It works with all the different legacy solutions we have and it allows us to look at things in one location, as opposed to going to a lot of different places.""Workload Automation's most valuable features are perspective analytics and coding."

More Automic Workload Automation Pros →

Cons
"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful.""The job reporting feature needs improvement.""Integration of the solution could be improved."

More Automic Automation Intelligence Cons →

"There were many bugs in the last version. For example, we could only use capital letters for searching for agent names. Also, we had a problem with ONE Automation where we couldn't use the PGA and SGA in Oracle Databases for resolving RAM because the last version didn't have this capability.""It has a very complicated interface, which could be made to be more user-friendly.""There could be a better user interface for end users. They should make it more intuitive, not based on Java.""The frustration that we have probably had in the past is where CA tools run for a period of time, then they get deprecated, and you have to build a new one.""The new user interface needs improvement. The previous version was good and stable. Now, we have to check the new one before using a web browser. It is not stable.""It seems still very technical to get the full features out... Once you get to some of the leadership levels, such as myself, you don't have time to go digging into it. It would be nice to have some additional performance features such as reporting, analytics.""The versioning and support for the lifecycle of Automic's developed solution is what we were missing. However, this is coming in version 12.2, so I am looking forward to seeing how it works.""My biggest complaint is that there is no list price. We work with Oracle, Microsoft, IBM, etc., and all of them have list pricing. Automic, right up until today, has never had list pricing. This makes things difficult, because we need to plan budgets for the next year and can't."

More Automic Workload Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."
  • "Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."
  • More Automic Automation Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."
  • "Do your own proof of concept. Make sure you know what you want. Be clear about what you want the product to do for you. Go out and meet with the vendor, then test it."
  • "The cost of arrays is high. If you want to buy an array for an application, and see value from it, you need about half a million dollars. That is too expensive."
  • "It costs to scale. While, it is scalable, the add-ons are expensive."
  • "It has helped us reduce costs."
  • "You do not need any humans to start jobs, so you can save a lot of money."
  • "We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."
  • "We cannot use all the functions because they are too expensive."
  • More Automic Workload Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly.
    Top Answer:The product functions like any other scheduling tool, facilitating the execution of tasks in a customer's environment. Additionally, it supports FTP processes to various remote FTP servers without… more »
    Top Answer:It is easy to manage complex workloads and use electronic workflow automation.
    Top Answer:The solution was flexible in terms of pricing. We're moving away from it, not due to price, but rather based on our requirements. They did provide us with an unlimited license that matched our budget.
    Top Answer:The AI capabilities and predictive modeling aren't very good. I don't see a future for that. It's very basic. That's part of the reason we moved to Stonebranch. They have more analytic capabilities… more »
    Ranking
    20th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    367
    Comparisons
    310
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    427
    Rating
    8.5
    7th
    out of 51 in Workload Automation
    Views
    4,608
    Comparisons
    2,402
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    661
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Terma Suite
    Automic Dollar Universe
    Learn More
    Overview

    Today, many organizations embracing digital transformation are struggling to manage complex, mission critical workloads. Advanced analytics solutions are required to reduce risks and costs in a constantly changing technology landscape.

    Automic delivers enterprise workload automation solutions with a predictive analytics workload platform that provides companies the necessary visualization, adaptability and intelligence to successfully manage complex workloads. Unlike other vendors, Automic offers the only solution on the market which provides a single-pane-of-glass across multiple vendors and applications.

    With Automic Automation Intelligence your critical workloads data can be a source of business insights to drive improvements in your IT Operations, your digital transformation journey, and your business success.

    Broadcom's Automic Workload Automation (AWA) stands out as a robust and advanced solution in the field of workload automation and orchestration. Designed for complex enterprise environments, it enables organizations to automate, manage, and optimize their IT workflows and business processes. This solution is particularly beneficial for IT professionals and business executives seeking to enhance operational efficiency, reduce manual workload, and drive digital transformation.

    Automic Workload Automation offers a unified platform for managing diverse tasks across various environments and applications. This centralization simplifies the orchestration of workflows, enhancing visibility and control. IT professionals appreciate this feature as it allows for streamlined management and more efficient resource utilization. AWA's architecture is designed to scale with the growing demands of businesses. It supports a broad range of applications and platforms, making it a versatile tool for different IT environments.

    AWA's analytics and reporting capabilities provide deep insights into workflow performance and potential bottlenecks. This aspect is particularly valuable for data-driven decision-making, helping organizations to optimize processes and improve overall efficiency. The ability to integrate seamlessly with a wide array of applications, databases, and systems, facilitates smooth and automated workflows across various IT landscapes, crucial for enterprises that utilize a mix of legacy and modern applications.

    Automic Workload Automation users on PeerSpot.com have highlighted several strengths; IT professionals frequently commend its robust scheduling capabilities, noting that it handles complex dependencies and scenarios with ease. The intuitive user interface is also frequently mentioned, simplifying the task of managing and monitoring automated workflows. Business executives, on the other hand, appreciate the solution's contribution to strategic business initiatives, such as digital transformation and cloud migration, due to its advanced automation capabilities.

      Sample Customers
      Information Not Available
      ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
      Top Industries
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm33%
      Manufacturing Company17%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Insurance Company5%
      REVIEWERS
      Financial Services Firm29%
      Manufacturing Company13%
      Insurance Company11%
      Retailer11%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Financial Services Firm21%
      Computer Software Company11%
      Manufacturing Company10%
      Insurance Company7%
      Company Size
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business13%
      Midsize Enterprise10%
      Large Enterprise77%
      REVIEWERS
      Small Business17%
      Midsize Enterprise17%
      Large Enterprise67%
      VISITORS READING REVIEWS
      Small Business14%
      Midsize Enterprise11%
      Large Enterprise75%
      Buyer's Guide
      Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation
      March 2024
      Find out what your peers are saying about Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
      768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

      Automic Automation Intelligence is ranked 20th in Workload Automation with 3 reviews while Automic Workload Automation is ranked 7th in Workload Automation with 85 reviews. Automic Automation Intelligence is rated 8.6, while Automic Workload Automation is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Automic Automation Intelligence writes "Useful multiple scheduler, centralized batch view, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Automic Workload Automation writes "A tool requiring an easy setup phase that provides its users with flexibility and flow chart visibility ". Automic Automation Intelligence is most compared with Redwood RunMyJobs, AutoSys Workload Automation, AppWorx Workload Automation, Fortra's Automate and Control-M, whereas Automic Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Dollar Universe Workload Automation and Redwood RunMyJobs. See our Automic Automation Intelligence vs. Automic Workload Automation report.

      See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

      We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.