We performed a comparison between CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It provides a simple reduction of headcount and also a reduction of run through time."
"If I have a higher workload with smaller machines, it is easy to increase everything."
"Jobs are planned automatically to eliminate the need to plan them manually. It also saves us effort because there is no need to create job objects manually."
"The product is stable. This is the reason that we are using Automic, in some cases, because of its stability and features."
"We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."
"The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good."
"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software."
"What I am missing today is robotics. If Automic would like to stay as one of the biggest automation engines on the market, they have to find an option with a robotics solution."
"In the last two years or so, Automic has not invested as much in the product as we would have expected."
"Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."
"The solution lacks acceptable stability."
"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further."
More CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 33rd in Process Automation. CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is rated 10.0, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] writes "Automation of job object creation increased the quality and quantity of our job requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". CA Automic Service Orchestration [EOL] is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.