We performed a comparison between AutonomIQ TestIQ and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools."UI is one of the best features of AutonomIQ TestIQ."
"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."
"The initial setup isn't too difficult."
"The Model-Based Test Automation is the most valuable feature, where you can create reusable components. Even though we are using a scriptless automation tool, there still needs to be an understanding of how to create reusable components and how to keep refactoring and how to keep regression, the test scripts, at an okay level. We are coupling Tosca with some other risk-based testing tools, as well, but automation is primarily what we're using Tosca for, the scriptless, model-based technology which is driving automation for us."
"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."
"The most valuable features of Tricentis Tosca are the Salesforce scanning. There are two scanning for Salesforce applications. There is Salesforce scanning and normal application scanning. Object identification has been really useful in Tricentis Tosca."
"One notable feature is its ability to handle negative XPath healing processes. If one XPath fails, Tosca can utilize backup XPaths to ensure test cases do not fail due to locator issues, thereby focusing on identifying application-side issues, which is the ultimate goal."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"It has helped teams within our organization become more aware of the testing requirements in terms of risk and priority."
"The ability to capture and record with the help of automation is not there in AutonomIQ TestIQ."
"It can be quite expensive."
"You need to spend much more time learning the tool and how to use it, compared to others."
"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."
"The solution needs to improve its simulation of mobile environments. Right now, that aspect is really lacking."
"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."
"The source controls that are in Tricentis Tosca have some problems. For example, if you use Selenium or use Java-based application, it's easy to match code from two developers. However, if you're a developer and going to look at Tricentis Tosca, it's very difficult to use the source control measure."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."
AutonomIQ TestIQ is ranked 20th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 96 reviews. AutonomIQ TestIQ is rated 9.0, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AutonomIQ TestIQ writes "A low-code and no-code tool for automation purposes that is very user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". AutonomIQ TestIQ is most compared with Katalon Studio, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
