Compare AWS CodeCommit vs. Liquibase

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AWS CodeCommit Logo
1,910 views|1,874 comparisons
Liquibase Logo
1,533 views|1,047 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Liquibase and others in Version Control. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If… more »
Top Answer: Conduct a pilot with vendor support to make sure that you understand how you will integrate Liquibase into your existing processes and what the ROI will be on the license investment. It took us a… more »
Top Answer: I can't think of any features that are lacking. So far, it's been quite a good solution for us. And the vendor continues to enhance the product.
out of 14 in Version Control
Average Words per Review
out of 14 in Version Control
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Learn More

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Learn more about AWS CodeCommit
Learn more about Liquibase
Sample Customers
Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem
Top Industries
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm14%
Insurance Company11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Liquibase and others in Version Control. Updated: May 2021.
509,820 professionals have used our research since 2012.

AWS CodeCommit is ranked 8th in Version Control while Liquibase is ranked 5th in Version Control with 1 review. AWS CodeCommit is rated 0.0, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". AWS CodeCommit is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Liquibase is most compared with DBmaestro Database Source Control, Git, Bitbucket and Bitbucket Server.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.