We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and Iron Mountain Connect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."The storage backup is very efficient."
"It's stable."
"The solution helped us use R2 RBO to back up frequently."
"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."
"Our client’s infrastructure is protected by the tool."
"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."
"The MARS agent makes it easy to use."
"The fact that Azure Backup is integrated is one of its biggest advantages."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"The product could improve its performance."
"Azure Backup's licensing model is very challenging because it doesn't give a clear picture."
"I once tried restoring a Linux environment, and the size of the Linux VM or the data disk was really huge. It took a really long time to restore the environment and send the data from the storage to the disk. It took around 25 to 30 minutes, which was much longer than I anticipated. They can improve the duration of such restore operations. In the next release, it would also be good if they could reduce the duration for transferring the data from their storage to the actual storage while creating a virtual machine. They can reduce the duration or increase the data transfer rate."
"The user interface is a little bit confusing and it could be better."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"The compression ratio of the backup data should be improved."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews while Iron Mountain Connect is ranked 37th in Backup and Recovery with 2 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while Iron Mountain Connect is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Iron Mountain Connect writes "Good policies related to data". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Iron Mountain Connect is most compared with IBM Spectrum Protect, Veeam Backup & Replication and NAKIVO Backup & Replication.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.