We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Denodo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft supported us when we planned to provision Azure Data Factory over a private link. As a result, we received excellent support from Microsoft."
"The function of the solution is great."
"For developers that are very accustomed to the Microsoft development studio, it's very easy for them to complete end-to-end data integration."
"The data factory agent is quite good and programming or defining the value of jobs, processes, and activities is easy."
"Data Flow and Databricks are going to be extremely valuable services, allowing data solutions to scale as the business grows and new data sources are added."
"It makes it easy to collect data from different sources."
"Its integrability with the rest of the activities on Azure is most valuable."
"The flexibility that Azure Data Factory offers is great."
"Access to numerous forums and internet information."
"Overall, the product works quite well and has a good set of features."
"In PL/SQL, first you need to gather all the data and then start writing the file, but in Denodo you fetch the data and write the data simultaneously. So, for example, if you have 1 million or 2 million records, you don't have to wait to fetch all of the 2 million; you can keep on fetching and writing in the file simultaneously."
"The ability to connect to a lot of different sources."
"This solution provides us with the ability to sync data, and make it available for anyone to use across the business."
"Data mining is one of the valuable features. We're able to connect all of the data sources with the installed driver, so that is a good advantage in Denodo. Being able to join the tables and view them is also valuable."
"The most valuable features are data lineage and the concept of a semantic layer."
"The most valuable feature is the performance. Denodo is very useful, especially in this huge pharma environment. I've found that older SAP solutions were very tightly coupled to each other, which resulted in data restrictions. Getting data from different sources was tough and tedious. Compared to these old solutions, Denodo is very easy to work with for the analytical team. Now that we've implemented this virtualization layer, we are capable of getting the data very smoothly. We implemented a very small unit, but the performance and integration have been very good."
"The solution can be improved by decreasing the warmup time which currently can take up to five minutes."
"Some known bugs and issues with Azure Data Factory could be rectified."
"When working with AWS, we have noticed that the difference between ADF and AWS is that AWS is more customer-focused. They're more responsive compared to any other company. ADF is not as good as AWS, but it should be. If AWS is ten out of ten, ADF is around eight out of ten. I think AWS is easier to understand from the GUI perspective compared to ADF."
"My only problem is the seamless connectivity with various other databases, for example, SAP."
"Occasionally, there are problems within Microsoft itself that impacts the Data Factory and causes it to fail."
"Lacks in-built streaming data processing."
"Data Factory could be improved in terms of data transformations by adding more metadata extractions."
"There are limitations when processing more than one GD file."
"The support is not the best and should be improved."
"There have been some issues when you are at a table. Currently, Denodo exports data sets for a tabular model. When you are finished modeling your database or data warehouse they export a link to be used in Tableau. They should support other tools like Power BI."
"Lacks integrations with AWS, GCP and the like."
"The data catalog certainly has room for improvement. It is functional but we look forward to development. We are in constant contact with Denodo and they are fully aware of our needs."
"We can't scale it to meet digital requirements."
"I would like to see a proper way to avoid killing the sourcing systems."
"It would be beneficial to make sure that the team that will be using Denodo has some kind of training on how to use the product at least a month beforehand, and there could even be some kind of feedback or Q&A sessions to go along with the training. If Denodo were able to provide this kind of training, it would be very helpful to users in insurance and banking companies because the staff are typically older and not always technically-minded."
"Denodo's training documentation could be improved by providing more material. From an administrative standpoint, I've found that only Denodo websites provide the usual tutorials. It may be because it's a bit of a restricted tool, but it results in trouble with learning. Normally, I can find help and solutions from other sources, but I haven't been able to find any for Denodo. Other that, it's fine and it performs well. I only have six months of experience, so I can't accurately suggest improvements."
Azure Data Factory is ranked 1st in Data Integration with 81 reviews while Denodo is ranked 12th in Data Integration with 29 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Denodo is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Denodo writes "Saves our underwriters' time with data virtualization, but could provide more learning resources". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Denodo is most compared with AWS Glue, Delphix, Mule Anypoint Platform, Informatica PowerCenter and Palantir Foundry. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Denodo report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Greetings, Stefan.
Alteryx is basically an ETL tool that evolved to deliver some Data Viz and ML features too. This means that its main purpose is to extract data from different sources, combine and transform them and finally load them in a different database.
Denodo is a data virtualization tool, which means it does all the transformations without extracting from one place and loading to another one. It´s a cloud-based solution and it charges by the traffic. If your company has specific General Data Protection Regulation that prohibits for instance that you extract the data located in a data center in Europe and loading them in a cluster located in the USA, you will probably need a virtualization tool like Denodo instead of an ETL like Alteryx. Virtualization tools are usually more expensive in a long run
Azure Data Factory is a platform meant to leverage the use of Azure. Microsoft´s objective is to sell its cloud solution as a whole. It contains a Data Studio (to manage and control your data), SPARK (which is a Hadoop in memory) and a data lake storage.
As you see, those are 3 different products that do not make much sense to be used together.
I'd say that there is a misconception in some of the answers (but don't worry, it's a common one).
Alteryx is not an ETL tool, it's an analytics platform with very powerful ETL capabilities (accessing mostly all data sources available and processing them at high speeds among others).
But additionally, Alteryx gives you the ability to carry on with the complete analytics cycle, processing, cleaning, blending those diverse data sources, modeling descriptive, predictive, prescriptive analytics (plus some ML & AI), outputting to another humongous variety of data sources, reporting or visualization tools.
All of the previous can be achieved with no coding at all, but in case you want to code, Alteryx also offers Python, R & Scala native integration. In other words, it can solve business users' use cases and advanced/technical use cases at the same time.
Finally, it's a fixed license, with no additional costs per usage (at least so far, until they release the Cloud Version).
I hope I was able to clarify the role of Alteryx in the analytics landscape.