Azure Site Recovery vs VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,050 views|823 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
414 views|351 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Disaster Recovery as a Service Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems.""Azure Site Recovery is an easy-to-use and fairly stable solution for disaster recovery.""The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products.""What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution.""It is a very stable product and very scalable.""Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery.""They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.""Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."

More Azure Site Recovery Pros →

"Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.""Technical support is very proactive and helpful.""The most valuable features are the backup and disaster recovery services.""We feel the ability to move virtual machines while they are still running to be the most valuable feature.""The initial setup is easy depending on the environment you are working with."

More VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery Pros →

Cons
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional.""We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor.""One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately.""The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved.""It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location.""When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.""It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support.""Could have more integration with other platforms."

More Azure Site Recovery Cons →

"It would be ideal if they added advanced analytics or AI to the solution.""The automation should be simplified or improved.""The improvements should be as per customer requirements.""VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery could improve by enhancing the network bandwidth from the storage.""When starting up the replication and converting it to the virtual machine I had some problems. I had to start the process again and that is inconvenient."

More VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It should have more straightforward billing. The billing was what got funky. It was really cheap. We would pay based on the usage. We paid around $225 a month for site-to-site replication."
  • "I'm not sure about the Azure Site Recovery pricing, but my organization gets monthly bills from providers."
  • "The tool's licensing is yearly and not expensive."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is neither very expensive nor very cheap."
  • "They have a license to pay."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is affordable."
  • "Azure Site Recovery is a very reasonably priced product."
  • More Azure Site Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would say VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is very expensive in comparison with other available virtualization solutions."
  • "The price of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery should be lowered in order to compete better in the market."
  • "The pricing is good."
  • More VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore.
    Top Answer:The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the solution should provide ease of use to its users and try to be a complete solution… more »
    Top Answer: Setting up VMs can be done quickly. It is easy to use.
    Top Answer:The improvements should be as per customer requirements.
    Top Answer:We have three different VMs. During long business hours, we can shift from PR to DR. It has high availability.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,050
    Comparisons
    823
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    414
    Comparisons
    351
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    147
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Datrium DRaaS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

    Datrium Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) with VMware Cloud on AWS is transforming DR with its cloud-native design, built-in backup, instant RTO, and on-demand model. It’s liberating IT from the complexity of legacy DR approaches and standalone backup tools.

    For more information, please visit www.datrium.com.

    Sample Customers
    Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, Rackspace
    Certainty Home Loans, VPay, ZEON
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Government8%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company12%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Disaster Recovery as a Service
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Nutanix and others in Disaster Recovery as a Service. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 5 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery writes "Application can be migrated from one host to another in respects of virtual machines without the user taking notice". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, whereas VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto, VMware SRM, Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik and N-able Cove Data Protection.

    See our list of best Disaster Recovery as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Disaster Recovery as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.