Compare Azure Site Recovery vs. N2WS Cloud Protection Manager

Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 2 reviews while N2WS Cloud Protection Manager is ranked 12th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 5 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.6, while N2WS Cloud Protection Manager is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Provides a seamlessly integrated recovery option for small to medium size enterprise companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of N2WS Cloud Protection Manager writes "Reliable cloud data backup solution but could use more management tools". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery, Veeam Backup & Replication and IBM Disaster Recovery Services, whereas N2WS Cloud Protection Manager is most compared with CloudRanger, CloudEndure Disaster Recovery and Veeam Backup & Replication.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Azure Site Recovery? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, NetApp, Zerto and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: March 2020.
408,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product.The solution is very easy to use.

Read more »

The product is successful with the SMB market.The backup and restore functionality is very easy to use and manage.Provides easy, one-click functionality and flexible backup policies and schedules for AWS workloads.The recovery time is fantastic and proven. Also, by providing a simple interface, the solution lowers the cost.The backup and recovery are the most valuable features. So, our developers can work with confidence.

Read more »

Cons
It could include more of a backup and recovery.When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit.

Read more »

It's a global feature that the customer thinks they don't have enough tools to manage, to copy, to delay, and to classify the object file in the backup directory. So they need more tools to manage files in object directory.The GUI could be slightly improved.Additional features I would like to see are the ability to restore to different vendors, AWS and Azure, and/or the ability or take the information out of the AWS cloud.More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios.The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The price is not cheap, nor is it costly.It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs.It's very economical and worth the cost.The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button.The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary.AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions are best for your needs.
408,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
229
Comparisons
191
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
471
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
901
Comparisons
539
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
513
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Learn
Microsoft
Veeam Software
Overview

Help your business to keep doing business - even during major IT outages. Azure Site Recovery offers ease of deployment, cost effectiveness, and dependability. Deploy replication, failover, and recovery processes through Site Recovery to help keep your applications running during planned and unplanned outages. Site Recovery is a native disaster recovery as a service (DRaaS), and Microsoft been recognized as a leader in DRaaS based on completeness of vision and ability to execute by Gartner in the 2018 Magic Quadrant for Disaster Recovery as a Service.

With Cloud Protection Manager, you get an enterprise-class solution purpose-built for the AWS cloud that provides full support for EC2/EBS, RDS, RedShift, & Aurora.

Offer
Learn more about Azure Site Recovery
Learn more about N2WS Cloud Protection Manager
Sample Customers
Russell Reynolds Associates, Union Insurance, RackspaceCoca-Cola, tecRacer, Cloudar, Goodwill
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, NetApp, Zerto and others in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software. Updated: March 2020.
408,726 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.