We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"The documentation is good, and it can be integrated with other products."
"What I like best about Azure Site Recovery is that it's easier to use because my organization already has Azure as an Active Directory solution."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"the interface is the most valuable feature and for the client it's security."
"In my opinion, the console or dashboard is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The most valuable quality of Veeam Cloud Connect is its reliability."
"I like the fact that it gives you the possibility to set the data out of the customer on-premises site and to have an off-site copy in your Cloud Data Center."
"It's a stable solution."
"One of the most valuable features of Veeam Cloud Connect is it does not require the use of an extremely fast internet connection for it to work. The backup process is automated which is great."
"The stability and restore options on the solution are very good."
"The most valuable features are the fast replication and recovery of data."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"When it runs, it runs well but when it doesn't run, the solution needs to make it clearer as to why and what the troubleshooting process is. All this would be possible if the error logging was streamlined a bit."
"Azure Site Recovery's deployment is complex. There are a lot of bugs, and it needs to improve stability."
"The pricing predictability and clarity around the final cost of the plan of this solution could be improved."
"The immutable backup could be better."
"It would be good if we could replicate the solution to multiple locations simultaneously because we are currently allowed to replicate to just a single location."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"It would be helpful if the enterprise edition was more complete. It's not as complete as the enterprise plus edition is. For instance, in the enterprise version, we can only use one accelerator with the cloud provider. It means if I have my Cloud Connect, I cannot connect another site of mine with another cloud connect and use an accelerator of Veeam. They should change this."
"We are now able to work on more security-related tasks with Acronis, as they offer features such as antivirus, DLP, and various cybersecurity options. This is a significant improvement compared to our previous solution with Veeam Cloud Connect, where we were lacking such features. It also allows us to offer a wider range of security options to our customers."
"The bandwidth optimization needs to be improved and have better efficiency so that you send fewer amounts of data from one site to the other."
"Doesn't back-up from KVM."
"The pricing is much higher than what our clients expect it to be."
"If a customer has a low budget, Veeam may be too expensive."
"Pricing could be improved and I also think archiving could be improved."
"The dashboard could be more intuitive."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 18 reviews while Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 23 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] writes "Useful updates, effective compression, and helpful support". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Zerto, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery, whereas Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Veeam Cloud Connect [EOL] report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
