Compare Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"It is a good anti-malware product that is highly stable.""The product is stable. It has a small footprint, but it does a lot of heavy lifting.""One of the most valuable features is the signature updating in near real-time.""They are constantly updating the solution against malware.""We have clients who are also migrating from other anti-virus solutions to GravityZone because of the ease of use, ease of installation and the fact that it can be deployed in the cloud and the same software; you can actually install on other server or workstation. It automatically knows what it's protecting.""I have access to it from anywhere.""GravityZone can be controlled from the cloud.""I like that you can manage all the time and you can uninstall and install everything via the web console."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Pros »

"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements.""We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area.""It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider.""The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time.""The blocking feature is the most valuable feature.""It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.""We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.""The signature update is done securely."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"In the future, maybe this will need to morph into AI threat intelligence.""The one thing that we are missing and want to see is user analytics. So, that is what I'm really interested in: behavior analytics and end user behavior.""What's happening now in this field is artificial intelligence, the behavior part. That is now the trend in many products, including Bitdefender, and this is where the product needs improvement.""I would like to see a remote desktop for installed endpoints so administrators can see what is on a user's screen or what a user is doing.""The pricing should be improved. The user interface has been improved on a yearly basis. The key issue is that they need to look at their pricing.""The solution wasn't designed to be used in France.""We find it's making the machines run slow.""The outreach from support was a bit bad according to their plan, but we've got two people here that manage and support GravityZone and interact with them and they manage it very well."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Cons »

"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities.""It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up.""I would like to have more forensic features. For example, if we are hit by an attack, I would like to have tools to investigate what kind of attack, who has attacked, how it was attacked, and what we could do to stop this kind of attack in the future. I would like to have more forensics capability built into Kaspersky.""I would like to see better reporting.""If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution.""It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features.""The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.""There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price is per license per endpoint. The price is different for everyone, but we find the price is cheap for us.""Licensing is done on a yearly basis and it's workstation-based.""It has a suitable price for every company and organization.""There is a fully functional trial that we used and we didn't have any issues.""There are different packages available that vary in terms of licensing fees."

More Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is a cost-effective product.""The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates.""It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec.""For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD)."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Top Answer: I’m not familiar with Trend Micro but with BDGZ. BDGZ is in the top 3 in my opinion. It has a full security suite, great… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Bitdefender GravityZoneKaspersky Work Space Security
Learn
Cisco
Bitdefender
Kaspersky Lab
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Bitdefender GravityZone's ENDPOINT SECURITY TOOLS intelligent security agent assesses the host machine at installation to self-configure to optimal form, and adapts its behavior according to endpoint accessibility. Security administrators allocate resources to security tasks through policies per groups of machines. They can set security tools to work on a local machine, or they can decide to rely more on Bitdefender Global Protective Network, or totally offload security to security servers.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankMentor Graphics, Rudersdal KommuneACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider26%
Computer Software Company26%
Government6%
Retailer3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider23%
Media Company6%
Construction Company5%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Construction Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider26%
Media Company6%
Retailer4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise55%
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise19%
REVIEWERS
Small Business66%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise21%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
443,152 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is ranked 7th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 13 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 18 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is rated 8.4, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra writes "Easy to use, easy installation and can be installed on other servers or workstations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "A mature product offering good protection and very good features". Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, SentinelOne, Sophos Intercept X, CrowdStrike Falcon and Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, ESET Endpoint Security, Microsoft Windows Defender, Sophos Intercept X and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security report.

See our list of .

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.