Compare Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is ranked 32nd in Endpoint Protection for Business with 3 reviews while Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 14th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 8 reviews. Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is rated 7.4, while Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection writes "An excellent endpoint protection that's scalable and reasonably priced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "Offers a good scope and a good ability to shut attacks down then go back and see what happened". Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is most compared with Cylance, CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks Traps, whereas Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with CrowdStrike, McAfee Complete Data Protection and Microsoft Windows Defender. See our Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature.The solution has exchange protection. It has a content control, device control, a firewall, and anti-malware as well. They are all quite valuable features for us.I like the simplicity of this solution and the fact that it saves us time. The deployment was really straightforward and useful and I am impressed by the anti-virus endpoint detection and response offered by this solution.

Read more »

I am really satisfied with the technical support.The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.Real-time threat prevention using sandboxing, file trajectory, and retrospective security.

Read more »

Cons
The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit.There needs to be better integration with the environment. Especially, for the active directory and also for keeping up with the changes from Microsoft. We use a lot of Microsoft OS. I have noted that sometimes they lag behind Microsoft updates. For example, when with Windows 10. I had some issues with deploying to Windows 10 because the solution was behind in updating their own services to match the Microsoft release.There are blurred lines between anti-virus and endpoint detection so I would say it can be confusing when you are considering buying this program. I would like to see that being explained better to the customer.

Read more »

I would like more seamless integration.The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.The solution needs more in-depth analytics.I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
There's a yearly cost for licensing. For us, that comes to $1,400. There are no additional costs beyond the license itself.

Read more »

The price is very good.The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.​Pricing can be more expensive than similar software that does less functionality, but not recognized by customers.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business solutions are best for your needs.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
495
Comparisons
322
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
478
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
9,846
Comparisons
6,506
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
357
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
HVI
Learn
Bitdefender
Cisco
Overview
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection (HVI) is the first security solution that is able to uncover memory violations that endpoint security tools sometimes miss by directly analyzing raw memory lines - thereby ensuring they are not being altered by malware.

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Offer
Learn more about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Government25%
Comms Service Provider13%
University13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government12%
Construction Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
384,324 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email