Compare Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I like the simplicity of this solution and the fact that it saves us time. The deployment was really straightforward and useful and I am impressed by the anti-virus endpoint detection and response offered by this solution.""The solution has exchange protection. It has a content control, device control, a firewall, and anti-malware as well. They are all quite valuable features for us.""The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Pros »

"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

Cons
"There are blurred lines between anti-virus and endpoint detection so I would say it can be confusing when you are considering buying this program. I would like to see that being explained better to the customer.""There needs to be better integration with the environment. Especially, for the active directory and also for keeping up with the changes from Microsoft. We use a lot of Microsoft OS. I have noted that sometimes they lag behind Microsoft updates. For example, when with Windows 10. I had some issues with deploying to Windows 10 because the solution was behind in updating their own services to match the Microsoft release.""The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Cons »

"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There's a yearly cost for licensing. For us, that comes to $1,400. There are no additional costs beyond the license itself."

More Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The endpoint protection is the solution's most valuable feature.
Top Answer: I believe we bought the solution on a three-year license. There are no additional costs above the standard licensing fee.
Top Answer: The database needs improvement. It needs to be updated quite a bit. Technical support needs a lot of improvement.
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as well. We use AMP on the endpoints for writing automated policies in order to… more »
Ranking
Views
623
Comparisons
426
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
478
Avg. Rating
7.3
Views
15,269
Comparisons
10,916
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
1,542
Avg. Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
HVI
Learn
Bitdefender
Cisco
Overview

Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection (HVI) is the first security solution that is able to uncover memory violations that endpoint security tools sometimes miss by directly analyzing raw memory lines - thereby ensuring they are not being altered by malware.

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Offer
Learn more about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Sample Customers
Kansas Development Finance Authority (KDFA), QuilvestHeritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider26%
Government6%
Retailer3%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise55%
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is ranked 34th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 3 reviews while Cisco AMP for Endpoints is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 17 reviews. Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is rated 7.4, while Cisco AMP for Endpoints is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection writes "An excellent endpoint protection that's scalable and reasonably priced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco AMP for Endpoints writes "We have gained more visibility into what's going on because it detects a lot of threats". Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Kaspersky Endpoint Security, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ESET Endpoint Security, whereas Cisco AMP for Endpoints is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. Cisco AMP for Endpoints report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.