We performed a comparison between Blackberry UEM and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."A great solution for anyone wanting a modern endpoint device management solution."
"Conditional access helps me control uncontrolled access."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"There is a single pane of glass for user access and a single sign-on facility for the user. If you have already logged in to Microsoft Azure or on-premises, you can redirect directly to Microsoft Endpoint Manager, monitor all your security threats, and analyze the data associated with the application in a single, unified way."
"Conditional access has helped us tailor and enforce our security policies in the mobile space."
"It has a useful device management feature."
"The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed us to manage many devices and applications from a single platform."
"Stability is a primary factor, and then there's the ease of distribution and policy management."
"The most valuable features are the fact that it was running in the background and it would intercept any weird stuff, and the fact that it would send things directly to the cloud for sandboxing. It's quite practical."
"The product's most valuable features are massive user and feature intelligence exploit detection."
"Best solution for avoiding security breaches, malware attacks, and other kinds of security issues."
"The tool's use cases are relevant to security."
"Monitoring is most valuable."
"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."
"I've found the solution to be highly scalable for enterprises."
"The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune."
"Integrating certain group policies can be challenging and may necessitate using on-premises systems to integrate them with Microsoft Intune."
"The solution requires Mac support."
"The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose."
"Reporting in Microsoft solutions is pathetic. With Intune, I'm getting a free inventory tool, but I don't get a reporting tool. When I go to Intune, I can see one machine's entire data in terms of the hardware and the software running on it, but I cannot generate a report for all the machines in the organization. The reporting is the only feature holding back the functionality that is already there."
"Microsoft Intune lacks the ability to provide seamless remote assistance or remote control."
"The biggest problem we ever have is when something goes out of date after 30 days when nobody has logged into it. We do have a problem trying to get those back online. We've been working with Microsoft to resolve that problem, but that's been the only issue that we've had in the last few years."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it."
"Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR does not detect malicious activity like in other anti-virus solutions like Trend Micro and Windows with Cisco."
"It'll help if customization was easier."
"The dashboard is the area that needs to improve so that we can have the ability to drill down without having to go elsewhere to verify results."
"In general, the price could be more competitive."
"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response)."
"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."
"When it comes to core analysis, and security analysis, Cortex needs to provide more information."
"Impact on system performance is horrible, adding a lot of delays for users."
More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Blackberry UEM doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 4th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 80 reviews. Blackberry UEM is rated 7.0, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Blackberry UEM writes " An affordable solution to control BlackBerry applications but has latency issues ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "Perfect correlation and XDR capabilities for network traffic plus endpoint security". Blackberry UEM is most compared with Blackberry Dynamics Apps, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trend Micro Apex One.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.