We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and FME based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"It has a very friendly user interface. You don't need to use a lot of code. For us that's the most important aspect about it. Also, it has a lot of connectors and few forms. It has a strong facial aspect. It can do a lot of facial analysis."
"The most valuable feature of FME is the graphical user interface. There is nothing better. It is very easy to debug because you can see all steps where there are failures. Overall the software is easy to optimize a process."
"All spatial features are unrivaled, and the possibility to execute them based on a scheduled trigger, manual, e-mail, Websocket, tweet, file/directory change or virtually any trigger is most valuable."
"It has standard plug-ins available for different data sources."
"We make minor subtle changes to the workbenches to improve it. We can share the workbenches. We don't have to use GitHub or anything else."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"Documentation could be improved."
"It crashes if we run high-volume integration."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow."
"The one thing that always appears in the community is the ability to make really easy loops to loop through data efficiently. That needs to be added at some point."
"To get a higher rating, it would have to improve the price and the associated scalability. These are the main issues."
"Improvements could be made to mapping presentations."
"FME can improve the geographical transformation. I've had some problems with the geographical transformations, but it's probably mostly because I'm not the most skilled geographer in-house. The solution requires some in-depth knowledge to perform some functions."
"FME's price needs improvement for the African market."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while FME is ranked 25th in Data Integration with 5 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while FME is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FME writes "Great for handling large volumes of data, but it is priced a bit high". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas FME is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Alteryx Designer, Talend Open Studio, SSIS and Denodo. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. FME report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.