We performed a comparison between Elastic Observability and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: In comparing Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to Elastic Observability, it can be concluded that Elastic Observability is the preferred choice. Users appreciate its cost-effectiveness and licensing compared to other tools, making it a more economical option. It offers a wide range of features, easy deployment, flexibility, and machine learning capabilities. Customer service and support are highly regarded, and the initial setup can vary in complexity.
"I found the solution's end-to-end analysis and flexibility most valuable."
"Enables me to monitor multiple servers, applications, resources, and users"
"If there's something that you really need to get at that doesn't come out of the box, you can pretty easily put together some custom metrics and get those in place."
"The time it takes to track problems in applications is the most valuable return that we have from this solution."
"Some of its valuable features include transaction traces, dashboards, and metric grouping to see combined data."
"The APM tool allows us to monitor performance of that application, where are the pain points, where are the slowdowns, to focus on where we can fix those."
"CA APM is very scalable and used in a clustered environment because it supports more than its technical capacity."
"We receive good transactions from it with good graphs, as well, documenting the activities of total visitors on the site. We can pull the reports and provide them to the client, as required."
"The ability to ensure that the data is searchable and maintainable is highly valuable for our purposes."
"I have built a mini business intelligence system based on Elastic Observability."
"It has always been a stable solution."
"The solution has been stable in our usage."
"For full stack observability, Elastic is the best tool compared with any other tool ."
"The architecture and system's stability are simple."
"Its diverse set of features available on the cloud is of significant importance."
"Elastic Observability significantly improves incident response time by providing quick access to logs and data across various sources. For instance, searching for specific keywords in logs spanning over a month from multiple data sources can be completed within seconds."
"As applications move to the cloud, we need more cloud-based solutions from CA APM. This is currently unavailable."
"Java Console uses too much memory."
"Technical support is slow to respond and also asks redundant questions."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive and address support tickets more quickly."
"User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment."
"The technical support is very poor."
"The reason it's not a ten is because they don't focus enough on improving over time like other competitors do who have a more modern and complete tool."
"We enountered stability issues. They were mitigated by performance tuning within infrastructure."
"In the future, Elastic APM needs a portfolio iTool. They can provide an easy way to develop the custom UI for Kibana."
"There's a steep learning curve if you've never used this solution before."
"The solution would be better if it was capable of more automation, especially in a monitoring capacity or for the response to abnormalities."
"There is room for improvement regarding its APM capabilities."
"Elastic Observability’s price could be improved."
"The interface could be improved."
"Elastic Observability needs to improve the retrieval of logs and metrics from all the instances."
"Improving code insight related to infrastructure and network, particularly focusing on aspects such as firewalls, switches, routers, and testing would be beneficial."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is ranked 25th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 161 reviews while Elastic Observability is ranked 7th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 22 reviews. Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is rated 8.0, while Elastic Observability is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom DX Application Performance Management writes "Provides efficiency in migration and DAW but requires a high level of administrator knowledge for configuration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Elastic Observability writes "The user interface framework lets us do custom development when needed. ". Broadcom DX Application Performance Management is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, VMware Aria Operations for Applications, BMC TrueSight Operations Management and New Relic, whereas Elastic Observability is most compared with Dynatrace, New Relic, AppDynamics, Azure Monitor and Sentry. See our Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Elastic Observability report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Container Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
