We performed a comparison between Broadcom Payment Security and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."The service works as described, the Admin console is very good along with customer service, and"
"For us, it enables the bank or the issuer to offer their customers protection on their online transactions."
"I use this product to extract cases from there and then send it to Ops to review and analyze."
"In terms of the fraud that we see on the card site, card not present fraud, the person gives contribution to what the total fraud has increased substantially."
"I think for us, the value that we get out of CA is their effective scheme diagnostics."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The case management tool is user friendly."
"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."
"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."
"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."
"I had wish it would be this one, this authentication for fingerprint and face would be promising."
"This solution can improve around the challenge rates and the failures."
"I think improvements for us, it's making it simple enough that anybody can understand how it works."
"Probably having more flexibility and working on usability and how we use the solution."
"The service is improving with the implementation of 3D Secure 2.0."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"Could include additional customization"
"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."
"The patch section has room for improvement."
"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."
"Its user interface could be better."
"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Broadcom Payment Security is ranked 23rd in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. Broadcom Payment Security is rated 8.8, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Broadcom Payment Security writes "Versatility in rule variables allows for customization and optimization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". Broadcom Payment Security is most compared with Broadcom EMV 3-D Secure (3DS), whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
