We performed a comparison between Camunda and Genpact Cora SeQuence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is that, with a visual system, you can try to have a process client before beginning the programming for the application."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"The solution is good for data models."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"It is very stable. There is no downtime."
"The new reporting and the new dashboard features are really good."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"In the latest version, there are certain workflow nodes that are missing. Camunda should bring those back, or rather, develop them quickly."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The design of the interface, in general, could be improved. It could be a bit more user-friendly."
"The setup and configuration is complex."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Genpact Cora SeQuence is ranked 38th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while Genpact Cora SeQuence is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Genpact Cora SeQuence writes "It is a very stable and scalable product without downtime". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Genpact Cora SeQuence is most compared with Appian, IBM BPM, Hubble and Tungsten TotalAgility. See our Camunda vs. Genpact Cora SeQuence report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
