We performed a comparison between Camunda and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"The product is stable."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."
"It has an open BPM"
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."
"Simulation is most valuable."
"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."
"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."
"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."
"Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"The solution could use some enhancements like adding connectors, improving forms and having a mobile app, but everything is an enhancement rather than a flaw."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."
"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."
"With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex."
"It can be more user-friendly."
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."
"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."
"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."
"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 15th in Business Process Design with 15 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and ADONIS. See our Camunda vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
