We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"The most valuable features are the management of internal processes, the ability to execute from design and the model for internal processes, the ability to make processes visible, and the ability to have information about the current state of each instance."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The support team responds fast."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The business model could be easier to understand."
"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."
"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."
"Documentation can be improved."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"When addressing a complex and extensive process, the domain it belongs to, be it banking, healthcare, or HR, requires widespread access."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, OutSystems and Appian. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
