We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can add almost one million columns to the solution."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"The most valuable feature is Kubernetes."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"The search function is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The data science aspect of the solution is valuable."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is that it is easy to install and to work with. It starts with the installation and from there on the management is very simple and centralized."
"The file system is a valuable feature."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"The initial setup of Cloudera is difficult."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is not always completely stable in some cases, which can be a concern for big data solutions."
"This is a very expensive solution."
"The Cloudera training has deteriorated significantly."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"The solution is not fit for on-premise distributions."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop has a limited feature list and a lot of costs involved."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, InfluxDB, ScyllaDB and Vertica, whereas Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and ScyllaDB. See our Cassandra vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
