We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."The technical evaluation is very good."
"Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"Cassandra could be more user-friendly like MongoDB."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, InfluxDB, MongoDB, ScyllaDB and DataStax, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with MongoDB, Accumulo, SingleStore, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
