We performed a comparison between MongoDB and Neo4j Graph Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."MongoDB is fast and efficient."
"The most valuable features of MongoDB are we have a lot of documentation and SQL-based applications that run on it."
"The most valuable feature is the speed of MongoDB."
"The installation is very easy to do and understand."
"I value the API integrations."
"It's super easy to develop a couple of solutions for clients with MongoDB, like a quick web page with no clear data structure that they need to spin up quickly to validate some sort of MDTP."
"The clustering is very good. It allows us to have high availability."
"The integration capabilities of MongoDB are fine for the solutions that we use in our company."
"Creates the ability to visualize outputs."
"Enables people to understand what the business problem is and how the technology helps."
"As a graph database, I am surprised at their performance and response time."
"There can be stability issues."
"MongoDB should be more stable, and support should be more efficient."
"MongoDB should incorporate more features, particularly search functionality, and real-time communication capabilities, to improve the database and provide data listening services. Currently, we rely on the Atlas offering, but it would be fantastic if MongoDB could develop a new solution or updated version that includes these features within its internal database and driver. However, I am uncertain if this would be a viable or profitable move for them, and I am speaking from a mobile-centric viewpoint."
"The transaction could use improvement. From MySQL, for example, you cannot create a transaction if you are reading and writing a document at the same time."
"The product's data consistency could be more efficient than traditional SQLs."
"The on-premises version of the solution is still pretty expensive, especially compared to the cloud version."
"It could be more stable. It would be better if it were more user-friendly like Oracle, which is very easy. For example, creating an index is simple in Oracle. In MongoDB, it's quite challenging to do that. Performance could be better. It's fast and good, but you cannot put every application that you would like to in MongoDB."
"The solution could include more integrations with other platforms."
"There are concerns about performance and whether the tool can necessarily scale to provide the solution."
"So far, we have not had any issues and are happy with the product in general."
MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 69 reviews while Neo4j Graph Database is ranked 7th in NoSQL Databases with 3 reviews. MongoDB is rated 8.2, while Neo4j Graph Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Neo4j Graph Database writes "Lots of training and documentation and excellent performance". MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Oracle NoSQL and Red Hat Data Grid, whereas Neo4j Graph Database is most compared with Cassandra, Accumulo, SingleStore, ScyllaDB and InfluxDB.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.