We performed a comparison between Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The WAN aggregation feature is the most valuable."
"It's a cloud-based solution that integrates well with everything."
"The visibility control and security aspects are amazing."
"The scalability is quite good."
"The query and the SD-WAN are useful features of the solution."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"It is quite simple and easy to use."
"The solution is a simple WAN solution. We've onboarded the socket on the Cato platform, and it provides connectivity. There is no complex routing."
"I am impressed with the product's security."
"I like Google Cloud IAP because it is easy to use and stable."
"I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"
"The solution is stable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is easy to install and use."
"I find the GCS Portal to be particularly valuable. It is more user-friendly and easier to navigate compared to other cloud providers, such as AWS. I particularly appreciate the user interface of GCS."
"The product is simple to use."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"They should include a web application firewall feature in the solution."
"Its functionality is a bit limited in some areas as compared to a Cisco solution. It is not as granular. It doesn't have the manageability, feature set, and capabilities of a larger or an enterprise-level solution. It just needs a more robust feature set and granularity."
"The product must evolve into the endpoint domain."
"I would like to see better integration with identity providers."
"The solution could be made more user friendly for the administrator to use the portal. It is difficult to use it for people who are not experienced with Cato Networks."
"Cato Networks could improve their intrusion detection. There is not a lot in place."
"The solution is not cheap."
"Modifying or incorporating Cato Network to work with a third-party platform, such as Microsoft, or other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) offerings would be beneficial. Having more integration partners would help the users implement the solution."
"The product must be more user-friendly."
"The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP."
"I think that the solution needs to be made available in a local region of every country, especially in countries like Taiwan."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"The solution should have better integration."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and should have descriptive manuals on the page website."
"We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good."
"The solution's AI integration could be improved."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 4th in ZTNA as a Service with 21 reviews while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco Duo and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks. See our Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy report.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors and best ZTNA vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.