Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA as a Service Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution.""The latest versions of the managed Kubernetes clusters are good.""The solution has many features for stability and security.""Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is an easy-to-use solution.""If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect.""I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss""The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use.""Google Cloud Platform has the best feature for real-time collaboration."

More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →

"The solution offers a simplified network infrastructure and security functions and it enables secure remote access for the users""It is easy to use.""The most valuable features are the File Type Control and SSL bypass policies. We""The most valuable feature of Zscaler Private Access is we do not have to connect to a VPN, it is seamless. It is more convenient for us because we use one agent to cover the internet and VPN access.""With SASE, we have a single platform that covers multiple task services with which we need to control access. All the features are equally valuable.""It is a stable solution.""We don't need to connect anymore. It is automatically connected when you log on in Windows.""The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pros →

Cons
"We have some challenges related to purging the data. We get a lot of data on a daily basis that has to be refreshed on the site, but we are seeing some challenges with that. They can also include some third-party integration. We have one Akamai dependency. If they can come up with some API to talk to Akamai, it would be good.""The solution is quite expensive.""I think this product needs to shift the focus from our software, our solution, like social media analytics to our customers; not maintenance in the hardware.""Google Cloud Platform is not a product that is very flexible for end-users, especially owing to the fact that there is not much documentation available for the product.""They should include case studies to learn about the use cases.""The UI of the solution is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.""We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution.""The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now."

More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →

"It has a limitation, if you are creating a rule or something for a web application or something, you could only add five users, not more than that. Five or four users are only included in a rule. If you want to create a rule for more than five or four users, you have to go through other methods, not particularly with the application. Working within the application with this method would be quite easy as compared to listing a URL or a normal IP address.""Zscaler Private Access's reporting is poor. We should have more insight into the reports regarding what is blocked and allowed.""Setup is a bit complex because there are many steps that need to be taken before onboarding and activating the solution.""The DX layer could be better if it had improved visibility.""We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler.""There are latency issues with the solution. They are small, however, they are there when you compare it to other vendors.""The interface needs a bit of work.""There is some issue while accessing the portal. It takes too long."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that the cost is metered based on the data, but I don't have the details."
  • "Its price is good. For each server, we are saving $300 a month. We have at least thousands of servers. It is a huge cost reduction for us."
  • "The customer purchases an annually sponsored license."
  • "I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive."
  • "When comparing the price of GCP to other solutions it provides more value for the money."
  • "The licensing costs us $100,000 so pricing could be better."
  • "It is expensive to scale up the solution."
  • "The solution is inexpensive for personal use."
  • More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."
  • "Pricing for Zscaler Private Access is moderate. It's acceptable, though I can't give you the exact price currently. It's not too expensive, and on a scale of one to five, I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."
  • "The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."
  • "The cost is expensive. It depends on the number of users."
  • "My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."
  • "The price is competitive."
  • "In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."
  • "Zscaler Private Access is extremely expensive."
  • More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is expensive. However, it is inexpensive compared to on-premise deployment. Also, limited storage for primary usage is free of cost.
    Top Answer:The solution is a bit complex and could be made easier to use. The solution should have an easier knowledge base. The solution should have basic-level certifications that encourage people to start… more »
    Top Answer: We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.
    Top Answer:Zscaler SASE is quite expensive compared to other solutions. The price is not fixed and it does not include all of the features, so my advice for organizations would be to evaluate their specific… more »
    Ranking
    7th
    out of 34 in ZTNA
    Views
    207
    Comparisons
    129
    Reviews
    29
    Average Words per Review
    322
    Rating
    8.4
    1st
    out of 34 in ZTNA as a Service
    Views
    10,795
    Comparisons
    8,553
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    403
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    GCP Cloud IAP, Google Cloud Platform Cloud IAP, Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy
    Zscaler SASE
    Learn More
    Overview

    Google’s mission is to organize the world‘s information and make it universally accessible and useful.

    Since our founding in 1998, Google has grown by leaps and bounds. From offering search in a single language we now offer dozens of products and services—including various forms of advertising and web applications for all kinds of tasks—in scores of languages. And starting from two computer science students in a university dorm room, we now have thousands of employees and offices around the world. A lot has changed since the first Google search engine appeared. But some things haven’t changed: our dedication to our users and our belief in the possibilities of the Internet itself.

    The Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enables fast, secure connections and allows your employees to work from anywhere using the internet as the corporate network. Based on the zero trust principle of least-privileged access, it provides comprehensive security using context-based identity and policy enforcement.

    The Zero Trust Exchange operates across 150 data centers worldwide, ensuring that the service is close to your users, co-located with the cloud providers and applications they are accessing, such as Microsoft 365 and AWS. It guarantees the shortest path between your users and their destinations, providing comprehensive security and an amazing user experience.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Retailer17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Media Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    ZTNA as a Service
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service. Updated: March 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 7th in ZTNA with 43 reviews while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is ranked 1st in ZTNA as a Service with 34 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange writes "Allows for strict access control, granting access to specific applications at a URL level rather than at the physical IP level". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Cisco Duo and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Axis Security, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Cloudflare Access.

    See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.