We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and Imprivata OneSign based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"The setup, via cloud, is simple."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"I found the solution to be stable."
"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."
"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."
"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"It has benefited my organization in the way that it makes it more secure by making it harder to hack."
"It provides a service that allows users to sign in to whatever application they are using. This is the most important feature of this solution."
"The tool has issues with the third-party SMS gateway. The solution has its own SMS gateway. Integration support is a challenge when we don’t use their SMS gateway. The tool also needs to improve its scalability."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."
"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."
"The user interface could be improved."
"They should have a landing page."
"I would like for them to make this solution compatible with Mac OS. I would also like for them to provide a portal so that users can easily integrate it with their applications."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 9th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 17 reviews while Imprivata OneSign is ranked 12th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 2 reviews. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while Imprivata OneSign is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imprivata OneSign writes "Reasonably priced, performs well, easy to deploy, and has responsive technical support". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas Imprivata OneSign is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Evidian Enterprise SSO, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Keeper. See our CyberArk Identity vs. Imprivata OneSign report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
