We performed a comparison between Delinea Privileged Access Service and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a cloud-based application, which makes it very easy to deploy."
"The solution is flexible."
"The most valuable feature of Delinea Privileged Access Service is we can use the server as a jump host. It is simple to manage the accounts on the system."
"The solution provides secure access to environments."
"The reporting is excellent."
"The vault and auditing capabilities are the most valuable feature because they include multiple reports that allow us to create our own reports."
"There are benefits in the security realm. We use Delinea at an enterprise level. I imagine there are productivity gains, but moreover, it's the security. We don’t enable staff to see the passwords of boxes but it's all being tracked and logged now."
"Delinea Privileged Access Service's UI part was very user-friendly for secure credential storage and management."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"This solution needs better integration with third-party solutions because their ability to support other tools is very weak."
"Although the interface is intuitive, it could be a little more user-friendly."
"There needs to be a notification when a password is near expiration."
"I would like for there to be a suitable solution to deploy a low-spec version for desktop password management to all our staff."
"Enhancing the solution by incorporating additional features to make it comprehensive would be beneficial. It would be more convenient to have a complete package solution that consolidates all the features in one place, making it easier to manage. Currently, I am required to access two separate servers for reports, which could be avoided if all the necessary features were available in a single location. This would be highly advantageous for managing everything effectively."
"The initial setup is a bit complex."
"The integration with sync could be improved."
"It is difficult to integrate the product with other IT systems."
"The stability is not very good."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"The configuration is difficult."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
More Delinea Privileged Access Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Delinea Privileged Access Service is ranked 10th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 10 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. Delinea Privileged Access Service is rated 8.0, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Privileged Access Service writes "Very cost-effective and provides secure access to environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". Delinea Privileged Access Service is most compared with Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management, Azure Key Vault, Delinea Secret Server, SAP Identity Management and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and Teleport. See our Delinea Privileged Access Service vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.