We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and Ivanti Tunnel based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"This platform has developed a reliable communication infrastructure that employees can use to communicate with remote workers."
"The safety of online interactions when working with this product has enabled members to convene productive meetings without fear of being attacked."
"The solution is easy to install, centrally managed, and stable, with good technical support and a straightforward setup."
"The IPSec VPN, Mobile Access, and Identity Awareness are three of the blades with which we have been working with since the pandemic. This has given us great mobility, making our network more dynamic."
"I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"The initial set up is not complex."
"Technical support has been excellent."
"The technical support team provides good services and faster response times."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The product’s architecture is a bit distributed."
"In an environment with multiple cluster checkpoints, the global properties common to all clusters in some cases give problems."
"There needs to be a way to create a VPN client specific to our environment so that we can easily lock down who can connect."
"The maximum it is giving us is only 5 licenses and if you need more, they must be purchased separately."
"In the case of URL translation of the VPN Web portal, the requests made from the front end to the back end weren't valid (due to the use of dynamic subdomains). In the case of host translations, the request was made to the same host, however, we cannot specify the ports, which, in our case, are used to redirect to different servers."
"Sometimes we have some small problems with Check Point Remote Access VPN. For example, problems with authentication."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN could be more user-friendly."
"The main area for improvement is pricing. Another area could be integrating MFA authentication directly into the solution instead of using separate benchmark tools for implementation."
"The product's interface needs improvement."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 60 reviews while Ivanti Tunnel is ranked 18th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while Ivanti Tunnel is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Tunnel writes "Provides efficient data security and good technical support services ". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Ivanti Tunnel is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and OpenVPN Access Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.