Compare Check Point SandBlast Agent vs. CylancePROTECT

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Agent vs. CylancePROTECT and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"Its ability to rollback anti-ransomware once an attack has started is the most valuable feature.""Its ease of use is the most valuable feature. We had existing endpoints and it was an easy upgrade process. The interface board is also easy to use.""Administratively, it's easy to control.""The security is its most valuable feature.""It helps us to detect running malicious activity in our network and after the COVID situation, most users are working from home where it becomes very difficult for IT admin to maintain security so such type of solution definitely helps us to prevent cyber attacks.""The graphical interface is very easy to use and intuitive, which greatly facilitates the work and greatly facilitates the work and the location of threats on the users' computers.""In terms of network usage, it actually reduced the amount of malicious attacks that we had. Before, we really didn't have a secure network. Each endpoint had to protect itself and probably most of them were not actually protected. Now, it's an entire process in which we've been able to cut down significantly the amount of malicious attacks by 60 percent that we get in the organization. It helps us to adequately monitor what has been going on with our network traffic and stopping individual attacks from accessing certain sites where we want to have restrictions or limitations.""We now feel more secure with our PCs, even more with the non-technical persons."

More Check Point SandBlast Agent Pros »

"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating.""The solution is pretty easy to scale.""The solution is stable.""On the management side, we liked the way it displays things.""The solution is extremely scalable. It's got the hybrid functionality, it's got the system functionality and cloud functionality as well.""The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features.""Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected.""Has good RAM capacity for the power I need"

More CylancePROTECT Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"It needs to include built-in deployment. This will make the job easier rather than having to go and dig up an Active Directory deployment along with policy objects.""There was a learning curve for our general population of employees (the user).""Off the top of my head, I can't think of a way it has improved my organization.""We know that Check Point has a very good database about threats even Check Point tries to make this EDR stable still there are some issues we were facing after upgrading or taking TAC to help its got resolved but Check Point really needs to work on metadata.""SandBlast Agent had moments in which it had a high load, we escalated it to the CheckPoint support that helped us to stabilize it. We had a problem with the parameterization of the solution. Once corrected by following the CheckPoint instructions, everything worked normally again.""There should be some way of managing this solution outside the organization's network, possibly with some type of remote access. For example, if I'm the admin of Check Point who manages the entire network, I would like to have access on my home device or maybe a mobile app to get reports, etc.""The solution could be improved in the future with a way to provide online training to customers for free, as other providers do.""Some of the less tech-savvy users sometimes find it difficult in adjusting and learning how to use the platform."

More Check Point SandBlast Agent Cons »

"I would like to see a better UI in terms of sifting through more specific data and providing analytics. A little bit more would be nice.""The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting.""The solution needs better dashboards that are easier to use.""It should provide more details about the events that they have detected.""I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices.""The OPTICS component could be made more user-friendly with respect to giving people more information.""I would like to see them fix the alerting system so that the endpoint reporting is a bit more streamlined.""It should have better support for Windows and Mac."

More CylancePROTECT Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"In terms of licensing, have a buffer zone around your projects in terms of the amount of endpoints that you want to have. You can always have more, but it is best to leave room for a little increase or growth.""The solution is too pricey.""One of the key factors that made us go with this solution was the pricing. On the licensing part, there was an initial complementary set of licenses offered in the initial onboarding package, either 15 or 20. Then, we had some complementary licenses in the initial purchase of the package. That was pretty useful."

More Check Point SandBlast Agent Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing cost for the solution is around $4,000 for six months. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.""We would just add more if there are new users, but right now you just need one license for per user.""I think that the price we are paying is good for what it is.""The monthly fee is $55 USD per user.""The product cost is about $5, per user, per month."

More CylancePROTECT Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I that feel there are two old problems still there in the market: 1-Vendors don't talk to each other. 2-Whoever is… more »
Top Answer: Has good RAM capacity for the power I need
Top Answer: We paid according to the number of endpoints that we have and it was approximately the same that we were paying for… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Learn
Cisco
Check Point
Cylance
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

SandBlast Agent is a complete endpoint security solution offering a fleet of advanced endpoint threat prevention capabilities so you can safely navigate today's menacing threat landscape. It provides a comprehensive system to proactively prevent, detect, and remediate evasive malware attacks.

Cylance® is revolutionizing cybersecurity with products and services that proactively prevent, rather than reactively detect the execution of advanced persistent threats and malware. Our technology is deployed on over four million endpoints and protects hundreds of enterprise clients worldwide including Fortune 100 organizations and government institutions.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Check Point SandBlast Agent
Learn more about CylancePROTECT
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankIMC, Alrov, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, Starkey Hearing Technologies, Community Newspaper GroupPanasonic, Noble Energy, Apria Healthcare Group Inc., Charles River Laboratories, Rovi Corporation, Toyota, Kiewit
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
Security Firm7%
Financial Services Firm7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government6%
Construction Company4%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider29%
Financial Services Firm29%
Manufacturing Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company43%
Financial Services Firm14%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
Construction Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider11%
Government6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise71%
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Large Enterprise33%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point SandBlast Agent vs. CylancePROTECT and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Check Point SandBlast Agent is ranked 20th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 9 reviews while CylancePROTECT is ranked 11th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 10 reviews. Check Point SandBlast Agent is rated 9.2, while CylancePROTECT is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Check Point SandBlast Agent writes "Protects against malware and phishing as well as DoS and MITM attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Proactive AI-based security that scales as we need it". Check Point SandBlast Agent is most compared with Kaspersky Endpoint Security, whereas CylancePROTECT is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Carbon Black CB Defense, SentinelOne, Microsoft Windows Defender and ESET Endpoint Security. See our Check Point SandBlast Agent vs. CylancePROTECT report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.