Cisco ASAv vs. WatchGuard XTM

As of February 2019, Cisco ASAv is ranked 17th in Firewalls with 5 reviews vs WatchGuard XTM which is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 13 reviews. The top reviewer of Cisco ASAv writes "We need the product to have HA pairs, so we can failover. It is relatively stable". The top reviewer of WatchGuard XTM writes "Helps me create firewall policies for networks and services". Cisco ASAv is most compared with Cisco ASA, Cisco Firepower NGFW and pfSense. WatchGuard XTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense and Sophos UTM. See our Cisco ASAv vs. WatchGuard XTM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASAv Logo
1,356 views|912 comparisons
WatchGuard XTM Logo
40,046 views|22,582 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ASAv vs. WatchGuard XTM and other solutions. Updated: January 2019.
316,268 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Among the top features are integrated threat defence and the fact that each virtual appliance is separate so you get great granular control.The transparency of the single UI to ensure security. A product has to be simple so that an administrator can use it.The integration and configuration were pretty straightforward.It is a comprehensive suite and complete package.

Read more »

I like the hostwatch because I can see what traffic uses the most bandwidth and I can block that site.I could still keep the data rates really high, up near the two gigahertz data speeds, without compromise on the security perimeters being acted simultaneously.We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them.Application Control is fantastic with over 2,500 applications and the granularity that we can either allow people to view but not be able to log on to Facebook; or view it and log onto it if they're in the marketing department, but not play Facebook games. There are all sorts of different options like that. So it's highly granular.Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process.They have a reporting system which can store data over a very long period of time. Not many other firewall vendors provide a reporting system, but if they do, like Fortinet does, then you've got buy that as an additional product and that can be more than twice as expensive as the initial investment in the firewall. And without reporting over a long-term period, you're just about wasting your time.It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time.​It configures in all-in-one place.​

Read more »

Cons
There are always vulnerabilities that come up and there was one in early 2018 but this was patched with software updates.The artificial intelligence and machine learning (behavioral based threat detection), which I can this will be coming out in another year, these are what we need now.Even on a smaller scale, people are finding you need HA pairs, and there's no way that the ASA can do that, at least in the virtual version.Cisco ASA should be easier to use. It is a bit tough to navigate and see what is going on.

Read more »

The setting policies need improvement. It needs an easier way to do static NAT and check on what policy is being used for that specific traffic.Setup of this solution is complex, it's not plug and play.Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product.WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job. The software could do it, but there's no hardware that allows that to happen at the moment. So it doesn't scale as well as some other products, that's for sure.The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out.​Cloud-based central administration of all devices from one point would be niceSyslog (Dimension) is focused on presentation, but needs more focus on utility like SonicWall syslog (GMS/Analyzer).The VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We are partners with Cisco. They are always one call away, which is good. They know how to keep their customers happy.With the Cisco ASA, you do get what you pay for. What would really be awesome is to see Cisco blow out a real cheap version where you can use the sandbox, but leave it step-wise and go to another product relatively easily, like getting you hooked on candy.Purchasing from the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was just point and click.It is pay-as-you-go, so it much cheaper than buying in the plants.Our individual release cycle has been quicker because the entire development and testing environment has been automated because of these virtual instances. It has aligned our development workflow. This is where we have seen the ROI increase.

Read more »

The licensing and renewal is very expensive.Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​Very competitive pricing regarding throughput compared to other alternatives.It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use.Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
316,268 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
17th
out of 48 in Firewalls
Views
1,356
Comparisons
912
Reviews
5
Followers
85
Avg. Rating
7.4
6th
out of 48 in Firewalls
Views
40,046
Comparisons
22,582
Reviews
13
Followers
676
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 27% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance
Learn
Cisco
WatchGuard
Overview


The Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance is a virtualized network security solution. It supports both traditional and next-generation software-defined networks (SDN), as well as Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) environments. The ASAv provides policy enforcement and threat inspection across heterogeneous, multisite environments.

Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection Ð but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.
Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASAv
Learn more about WatchGuard XTM
Sample Customers
BluelockAVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Healthcare Company14%
Logistics Company14%
Import And Exporter7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Pharma/Biotech Company17%
Manufacturing Company16%
Construction Company11%
Transportation Company10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco ASAv vs. WatchGuard XTM and other solutions. Updated: January 2019.
316,268 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email