Fortinet FortiGate Competitors and Alternatives
Read reviews of Fortinet FortiGate competitors and alternatives
Executive Cyber Security Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Sep 26, 2020
An excellent solution for the right situations and businesses
What is our primary use case?Palo Alto VM-Series is something we recommend as a firewall solution in certain situations for clients with particular requirements who have the budget leeway.
Pros and Cons
- "The Palo Alto VM-Series is nice because I can move the firewalls easily."
- "It has excellent scalability."
- "The product needs improvement in their Secure Access Service Edge."
- "They made only a halfhearted attempt to put in DLP (Data Loss Prevention)."
- "Palo Alto is that it is really bad when it comes to technical support."
What other advice do I have?My first lesson when it comes to advice is a rule that I follow. When a new version comes out, we wait a month. If in that month we are not seeing any major complaints or issues with the Palo Alto firewall customer base, then we consider it safe. The client base is usually a pretty good barometer for announcing to the world that Palo Alto upgrades are not ready. When that happens, making the upgrade goes off our list until we hear better news. If we do not see any of those bad experiences, then we do the upgrade. That is the way we treat major revisions. It usually takes about a month, or a…
Shashidhara B N
Director - Technology Solutions & Services at Connectivity IT Services Private Limited
Real UserTop 5
Jul 27, 2020
This best in class Next-Gen firewall is elegant in its ease-of-use and architecture
What is our primary use case?For different customers, we use the product in different ways. In some cases, it is going to be an on-premises solution. In some cases, it is going to be a cloud-integrated solution. That is one of the best things about Juniper. We can use a single box and have the same unified policy structure if it is off the cloud or it is on-premises. Our primary use case is basically to use it like you would any other firewall. I do not call this a firewall anymore because it has functionality beyond what we traditionally think of as a firewall. Those days are gone where a firewall does just one thing… more »
Pros and Cons
- "Juniper is one of the most powerful network security solutions while remaining simple to use, set up, and scale."
- "It could have features that other products support like blade options and stand-alone endpoint security."
What other advice do I have?My advice to anyone considering Juniper as a solution would be to first understand that the product needs to be chosen to fit the environment. You want to get the one right box that has the capacity you need. You have everything you need in the model by just updating your license. You do not have to look for a new box when your traffic remains under the upper limits of the capacity. If you are under the limitations of the capacity, the traffic goes straight out, unimpeded. On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate Juniper SRX as a nine or even a…
Network Administrator at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real UserTop 20
Sep 9, 2020
Enabled us to virtualize multiple firewalls on one machine
What is our primary use case?We use it for VSX virtualization and we use it for normal firewall functions as well as NAT. And we use it for VPN. We don't use a mobile client, we just use the VPN for mobile users.
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature for us is the VSX, the virtualization."
- "The VPN part was actually one of the most complex parts for us. It was not easy for us to switch from Cisco, because of one particular part of the integration: connecting the Check Point device to an Entrust server. Entrust is a solution that provides two-factor authentication. We got around it by using another server, a solution called RADIUS."
What other advice do I have?I would recommend going into Check Point solutions. Although Check Point has the option of implementing your firewall on a server, I would advise implementing it on a perimeter device because servers have latency. So deploy it on a dedicated device. Carry out a survey to find out if the device can handle the kind of workload you need to put through it. Also, make it a redundant solution, apart from the Management Server, which can be just one device. Although I should note that up until now, we have not had anything like that.
Executive Vice President Operations and IT at Sterling National Bank
Sep 29, 2020
A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs
What is our primary use case?With my first client on Viptela were getting MPLS (MultiProtocol Label Service). That is a type of communications network that most of the major providers like Verizon offer. They were paying roughly $3,000 a month for each one of their 30 branches. That was giving them 10 megabits per second. We replaced that with the likes of Verizon Fios and Comcast. Each one of those business internet services cost about $200 apiece per month. The cost of the SD-WAN was maybe another $200. So for $600 a month, we replaced something that was costing them $3000 a month, and they were getting a minimum of… more »
Pros and Cons
- "Using SD-WAN to combine services can result in better up time, higher speeds, and much lower costs."
- "There have been no issues with stability."
- "Huge companies use SD-WAN. It is largely scalable."
- "Any technical support we needed was great."
- "Cisco could do more to offer bundling of the SD-WAN and other solutions."
What other advice do I have?The advice that I would give someone in the market for an SD-WAN is to look at Gartner and see what Gartner has to say. My information is recent in that the bank that I implemented it in does other business with me and they tell me that everything is working great. They have never had a problem. It is now four years later and it is probably worthwhile taking a look at what the competition is doing — including Cisco Meraki, which is another SD-WAN offering from Cisco. A lot of companies have implemented Cisco Meraki, and Cisco Meraki is a good solution. But there is also Versa which is a good…
Network Security & Virtualization at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real UserTop 5
Mar 14, 2020
IPS system is the strongest you can get and it has good decryption
What is our primary use case?The primary use for this solution depends on the preference of a customer and to some extent their existing environment. We have to establish things like: * what are the business requirements * how we can utilize what is existing or if the client needs to upgrade equipment * what kind of servers do we put in * what kind of servers does he have on cloud * what kind of servers do we have on-premises So it all depends on the customer's requirements. If a query comes up with a client, I am happy to answer that and provide a resolution but the situation needs to consider specific needs.
Pros and Cons
- "The IPS system is the best in the field."
- "Higher levels of support are excellent but new users may need additional options."