We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SAP Customer Data Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco ISE is its seamless integration with the switches and the entire suite, enabling wireless access and smooth client information retrieval."
"The TACACS and RADIUS have been the most valuable features so far."
"The core point is that Cisco ISE is the same globally compared to FortiAuthenticator. Whether I deploy in China, the US, South Africa, or wherever, I'm can get all the capabilities. It allows me to directly integrate with 365, and from a communications point of view, that is a good capability."
"The implementation is very simple."
"The best features are the scalability and the license structure."
"When you push out the policy, it is able to populate the entire network at one time."
"The ability to integrate our Cisco AnyConnect connections to the active directory has been great."
"SAP CDC is very easy to use and the best part about this tool is its documentation."
"The user interface could be improved to make it more user-friendly."
"I believe that Cisco can improve the way its policies are built because it's a little complex."
"It should be virtualized because many people have begun migrating to the cloud. They should offer a hybrid version."
"The primary issue is the slowness of the application and the web interface. We have multiple admin nodes and app nodes. So when I need to get some information about a particular user, the GUI would take ten to fifteen seconds in loading when we need to know right away."
"Also, the menus could have been much simpler. There are many redundant things. That's a problem with all Cisco solutions. There are too many menus and redundant things on all of them."
"They should improve the upgrades. It's not easy to upgrade the solution."
"The Guest Network verification needs to add a QR code option."
"I would like to see them simplify the dashboard. It's very configurable, but, at the same time, it's not easy to maneuver through it. They should "Merakify" it."
"I have struggled to give different access to different users in the same application."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 135 reviews while SAP Customer Data Cloud is ranked 2nd in Social Login. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while SAP Customer Data Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Customer Data Cloud writes "Enables us to sell products which creates significant revenue but their disaster recovery needs improvement". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas SAP Customer Data Cloud is most compared with Auth0, SAP Identity Management, Okta Workforce Identity, ForgeRock and Symantec VIP Access Manager.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.