Most Helpful Review
Researched Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN but chose Mist Access Points: Has reasonable costs but the user experience needs improvement
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist Access Points and other solutions. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Its ability to be cloud-managed is the most valuable feature so if there's a reconfiguration or an issue, we have excellent visibility into the network and we can usually resolve the problem online without having to go onsite."
"The management and upgrades are very simple and straightforward."
"The solution is very stable. It is a very manageable and secure system."
"Multiple access ID capabilities, meshing, and the quality of the product itself are all valuable features."
"The flexibility, since it's a cloud service, is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"The functionalities are quite professional and complete. It offers good integration with other Meraki products, like switches and the firewall. You can get an overview of all networks and the host. It's really great; nobody else can do that."
"The most valuable features are the management tools, including monitoring and reporting."
"We can deploy it and check in on our customers without having an on-site connection or an on-site infrastructure for elderly customers."
"Ability to control the access points by groups."
"If you compare wired versus wireless, it's convenient. You don't need to have one place for connectivity. You can move around and it's easier. Sometimes it's a hassle to work with wires, which is why wireless is so convenient."
"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed. Some of the rules are a bit more complicated. The switch ports on the routers are not individually addressable, in the sense that with a switch you can tell what MAC address is on what port but with the security appliances, you can't, which would be beneficial for troubleshooting."
"Technical support can be improved, as well as having more detailed capabilities to go without using an API."
"In a future release, they should offer a next-generation UTM, where you can manage all items and the network, and have it include a lot of security features like fingerprinting functionality."
"Unfortunately, we have to deal with European privacy laws and as far as we can see, the solution is not compliant with these. It's why we're not able to continue with Cisco Meraki. They need to become compliant with GDPR laws."
"There is only one particular thing that needs improvement. Sometimes, for example, when you need to open a ticket, although it's under the umbrella of Cisco, you still need to go to the Meraki support."
"The commercial version of the solution could be cheaper."
"In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
"The technical support for Meraki needs improvements made to the waiting times."
"Configuration could be improved."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a pretty good value, but not great. Pricing is on a yearly basis for the Meraki solution."
"The price is good, but it could be improved."
"You have to renew your contract every year, or for three or for five years. If you do not pay right away they will suspend your subscription."
"The pricing is based on a subscription and is a bit high at the moment."
"This solution is quite costly and there are costs in addition to the licensing fees."
"This solution is slightly more expensive than others, such as Ruckus Wi-Fi."
"It's not super expensive and it's not super cheap."
Information Not Available
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In my opinion, the main difference is, that Cisco Meraki has a Controllerless cloud-based managing and monitoring system, similar to Aerohive. I don’t know Ruckus, but I would expect, that it is… more »
Top Answer: Hi Gilberto, All answers are correct. Adding a new point, currently through the Cisco SDN platform (DNA Center), it is possible to have visibility of the Cisco platforms (Aironet / Catalyst) and… more »
Top Answer: We have full range of Cisco Meraki MX appliances in production. The solution is perfect for smaller to large network requirement. Below are some key advantages. of Cisco Meraki Cloud Managed… more »
Top Answer: The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution.
Top Answer: Setup cost was quite expensive, it's a concern.
out of 24 in Wireless LAN
Average Words per Review
out of 24 in Wireless LAN
Average Words per Review
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
|MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN|
|Cisco Meraki access points are built from the highest grade components and carefully optimized for a seamless user experience. The outcome: faster connections, greater user capacity, more coverage, and fewer support calls. The Cisco Meraki dashboard gives visibility into the network users, their devices, and their applications. Armed with rich analytics, administrators can quickly create access control and application usage policies, optimizing both the end-user experience and network security.|
Best Wi-Fi and Bluetooth LE performance
Data collection, analysis and enforcement
Converged platform for Wi-Fi, Bluetooth LE, and IoT
Learn more about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Learn more about Mist Access Points
|Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins||Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta|
Financial Services Firm27%
Comms Service Provider27%
Non Tech Company9%
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company22%
K 12 Educational Company Or School5%
Comms Service Provider51%
Computer Software Company13%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
No Data Available
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 20 reviews while Mist Access Points is ranked 14th in Wireless LAN with 3 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Mist Access Points is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Provides high-performance, next-generation deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist Access Points writes "Fast, with good availability and good management". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless and Aruba Instant, whereas Mist Access Points is most compared with Cisco Wireless, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Ubiquiti WLAN. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Mist Access Points report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.