We performed a comparison between Cisco Wireless WAN and Mist AI and Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Ubiquiti Networks, Ruckus, Cambium Networks and others in Wireless WAN."The initial setup was really easy and straightforward."
"The program is very stable."
"The most valuable features for me are the ease of operation and scalability."
"This is the most stable product in the market."
"The most valuable features are CleanAir, Rogue Detection, and the auto-calculation of RF."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"The performance of the solution is valuable."
"I use Cisco because of its reliability."
"The tool's best part is the GUI. It is user-friendly and fast due to AI features. The solution can help you fix things with AI, which is impressive."
"Mist AI and Cloud have definitely improved the functioning of our organization. The access to the Internet, including its speed and reliability, has significantly improved."
"The cost is the most valuable aspect of this solution."
"Ability to control the access points by groups."
"The most valuable aspect is that they operate on small microservices, offering numerous open APIs that enhance the value of our Wi-Fi network. This flexibility allows us to optimize various aspects such as workforce planning and occupancy management. The platform is highly open in the market, providing robust APIs for seamless integration with other tools. Currently, we leverage these capabilities at a building site, incorporating IoT sensors to gather data. The collected data is stored in a centralized location, and we plan to use AI for analysis. This analysis will include insights on peak activity times, humidity levels, temperature variations, and other relevant metrics within the building."
"Has an extremely good feature set."
"AI is the most valuable feature."
"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."
"The only disadvantage of Cisco is maybe the cost."
"Cisco Firewall cannot recognize some applications and that makes dealing with policies difficult. Even when we whitelist, it does not work well."
"We did have issues with the product that made us concerned about the overall stability."
"The worst thing about the Cisco controllers is that they only have two ports."
"The technical scalability is easy, but the license scalability is quite tricky."
"The new platform of Cisco Wireless WAN I did not like, there weren't many features available. The online platform has more options."
"The initial setup and deployment should be easier."
"Include more managing features within the product, rather than having to purchase them as extras."
"Regarding opportunities for improvement in Mist, it is notable for its robust cloud portal and integration of artificial intelligence into various services, creating a highly efficient environment for work. However, a drawback lies in the cost associated with its WiFi offerings. With a pricing range of twelve hundred to fifteen hundred dollars for a single Access Point, exclusive of the subscription, it is acknowledged as a relatively expensive solution in the realm of WiFi services. Despite this drawback, the positive attributes of Mist make it a noteworthy option."
"There could be more integration."
"Mist AI and Cloud should be marketed more and focus on making partners in the industry."
"There seems to be different versions of standards used in the wireless access points. In the future, it would be helpful if the solution could come up with some kind of universal standard for all devices and all access points."
"Sometimes it takes a lot of time for the access point to connect with the cloud."
"Currently, the solution lacks the ability to configure with other solutions from other vendors."
"It would be beneficial to have support for the Chinese language."
"Mist AI and Cloud should improve its integrations."
Cisco Wireless WAN is ranked 4th in Wireless WAN with 61 reviews while Mist AI and Cloud is ranked 7th in Wireless LAN with 20 reviews. Cisco Wireless WAN is rated 8.2, while Mist AI and Cloud is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Wireless WAN writes "It's a reliable, user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mist AI and Cloud writes "A combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences". Cisco Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Fortinet FortiExtender and Ubiquiti Wireless, whereas Mist AI and Cloud is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, ExtremeCloud IQ and Ruckus Wireless.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.