We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"Provides good performance and speed."
"The initial setup is simple."
"The solution has very flexible configuration."
"The features that we have found most valuable are the web app support and VPN."
"Just creating that gateway to the storefront for Citrix is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."
"The product enables us to collect logs from the systems."
"The stability of the solution is perfect."
"It performs quite well."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"The platform is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It's extremely complicated and it's not intuitive. The solution requires a lot of training to get going on it."
"I would like to see better configuration of repairs and downloading certification."
"If there is an increase in the customer infrastructure, it is not stable."
"The solution has unnecessary limitations."
"Citrix Gateway could improve the speed of the VPN. I sometimes have to wait for 10 to 15 minutes to get connected and other times when I am connected I have to abort, and reconnect."
"The major issue is price. I would also like them to make other aspects more accessible."
"The initial connection could be faster. That handshake takes a few seconds sometimes. That could be better and improved upon."
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
Citrix Gateway is ranked 2nd in SSL VPN with 33 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti Connect Secure and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server, AWS Direct Connect and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. See our Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.