"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"It can send messages to our ticketing system."
"During my testing, the features that I like the most are that it can be integrated with my system, and it provides me with reports of all of my servers."
"I like being able to use proxy servers for different locations. The agents are pretty cool. They're easy to roll out. The standard out-of-the-box templates are also pretty easy to use. The integration with other learning products is also good. I have, in the past, used Slack, but we've integrated it with Microsoft Teams. We also use it for SMS with a service called Redcoat. It is very flexible. It does what I need it to do, and my manager is very happy because it doesn't cost anything. We are nearing 4,000 hosts inside Zabbix, and we've got another 6,000 access points to add to it. We've thrown everything at it, and it has managed to keep going. I am very impressed with the tool, and I'd shake their hand very hard if I got to say the compliments to the Zabbix team. They keep improving it and doing refreshes, which is one good thing about it. There is also online information as well as books that you can purchase if you're willing to read enough. There is a lot to pick up, but it is a pretty complete solution."
"It meets my organizational needs. It's pretty easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is monitoring."
"The solution is quite mature and very stable."
"The integration with third-party tools and the alerts are most valuable."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The APM monitoring has room for improvement, although I hear that the new 5.2 version has some improvements in that area, and I'd like to give that a go. I would like to see a few more templates out there for different styles of monitoring. I use the Grafana interface for reporting. I would also like it to have an out-of-the-box ability to email reports. You can create reports, but to be able to email those reports would be really helpful. I've got users who are not interested in logging in and generating a report. They want it all pre-canned and sent to an email address. It would also be really handy if we could pin certain reports up onto platforms such as Teams or SharePoint. A GUI for the proxy server would be cool to have for debugging purposes and for the support teams to have a look at, but I don't know whether that's really feasible to do. I get enough from the log files themselves."
"The event correlation could be better."
"We had some scalability issues with a large number of nodes."
"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"The stability could be better."
"The reports are not great and should be improved."
"In an upcoming release, there should be automated reports which we are currently doing manually. For example, if we collect a report file every day and want to send it to a moderator for review. We are expecting this feature to come out soon but it would be valuable to have now."
Claroty Platform is ranked 1st in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 1 review while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 98 reviews. Claroty Platform is rated 8.0, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Armis, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
