We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"I like the fact that you can find almost any product connection that you need and the list is always expanding."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"Data integration is the most valuable feature. The ability to connect to any of the sources and enterprise applications makes our lives easier."
"The product is scalable and excellent for enterprise-level organizations."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"The data mapping capability is a valuable feature."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"Performance also needs to be significantly improved, especially when connecting to SFDC for read and write operations."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"We would like to have accessibility to the repository."
"The error information provided is not informative, as compared to Power Center."
"Error reporting and debugging need improvement."
"The current features are a bit complicated, and we need to write big scripts and test."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework, Talend Open Studio and SSIS, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.